Some comments having just watched the game :-
1. The first 15 minutes and last 10 minutes of the first half were the best the Tahs have played all year in terms of execution in attack. By this I mean they kicked well from hand. They ran onto passes and supported the ball acrrier allowing a few offloads. They passed accurately in front of the ball carrier in a manner that allowed them to continue their momentum. Excellent. It was what I have been waiting for and posting about for the better part of three years. So what happened to the other 15 min of the first half and the second forty? In those periods we saw again the aimless kicks and players fell back into habits of failing to support, passes went all over the shop......... It is so disheartening as a Tahs support that you can see that when a long ball is fielded just out of the 22 that it will be kicked and always to the 5 metre line of the opposition 22. The set of the players is predictable and the opposition invariably reads it. How many of the Tahs kicks in this regard were fielded by opponents positioned exactly for this tactic.
2. Defence - they defended very well for long periods. They then went to sleep here and there and the Cheetahs scored a couple of very soft tries, or more accurately described as good tries initiated by very soft line breaks.
The issues:-
1. Where was this execution all year? The same place it has been every year, they wait until all is almost lost before dragging out this desperate game that breathes hope into the fans.
2. As for the defensive issues, I have to ask the question, are the Tahs fit? I know this was at altitude but it seems to me that they fall away regularly throughout matches. Their appliacation is not consistent within the match. The only reason I can come up with for that is fatigue. Perhaps this point would be better discussed with input from Bruce Ross. It is interesting that the easy metres the Tahs made in the first half totally disappeared in the second. Yes the Cheetahs tightened their defence somewhat but at the same time the Tahs forwards were totally unable to break the tackles they did in the first 40 and indeed started to get held up in mauls. Again, fatigue?
3. Communication & Leadership - I am assuming that Berrick was Captain went Fatcat was replaced. On that final play he was obviously set up for a drop goal and was screaming for the ball. Why did it not come? Is this another aspect impacted by fatigued minds? In this aspect the decision to select Elsom as Captain and the extended "leadership group" at the start of the year does play a part. How many of that "Leadership Group" were on the paddock last night? Barnes & Fatcat. So under fatigue without strong leadership to drive and guide the Tahs fall back to their base play (which is inaccurate and limited) and they lose games. This is a core failure of the coaching group, not just this year but over successive years.
The execution in that 25 minute period I discussed showed that the players have the skills when they are applied, what we don't have is the consistency in application, intensity in attack and defence on a consistent basis.
This was without doubt the best performance that the Tahs have produced this season IMO, as I said in terms of execution, whether that saves Foley though I do not know, seems to be a few carrion birds circling in anticipation of a kill.