I think we can all agree Phipps is rubbish.
I don't, thought he was good enough. For a 3rd string halfback in a 3rd string side.
I think we can all agree Phipps is rubbish.
That is a fair enough call. However, the reason I and others (I suspect) rate Taps is because he isn't the traditional 'bash it up' style of centre. He generally has a good ball playing aspect of his play, and will look to set up his outside man. I suppose this is why he is considered a better 12 than 13. He has an all round skill set.
He's a little shorter, but about the same weight as the other centres running around Australian rugby. We are definitely short a good 105-110 Kg centre
I don't, thought he was good enough. For a 3rd string halfback in a 3rd string side.
And the acceptance of mediocracy in Australian Rugby continues..
The issue with Taps bombing the try is that setting up the man outside is the 'bread and butter ' of the traditional outside centre.
I have observed that in the grassroots of rugby that many coaches have the tendency to play hard running centres rather than those kids with good hands who have the ability to set up their outside man. One of the reasons for this is that fast, young islander kids are so effective running in the centres where they are given a bit of space. But the problem is that they are there for their running and not for their passing skills and in many youth teams the tactics revolve around getting these big blokes the ball.
These kids are impressive and make all the rep squads. But at a certain point the size advantage that these kids have is diminished and they are required to do more than just run, so they are coached to develop their passing game, but deep down you can see that they are at heart and at the crucial moments, just runners.The kids that match these guys have to be tough buggers too, so what we end up with is a pool of centres who are tough defenders and hard runners with very poor handling skills. I give you AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper), McCabe, Taps, Carter, Apo, CFN and Cummins.
It is so important that the 13 can convert the situation that Taps was in this morning as they are rare try scoring and game breaking moments, particularly when you think about the quality of our back three. In the Shute Shield GF at the 65th minute Cummins had a two on one situation 10 metres from the line but went on his own, only to be tackled, bomb the try and then lose the ball with which SUni scored shortly afterwards. This was a 14 point turnaround and Cummins' team only lost by only 1 point!
Haven't seen a lot of Taps, but for me he failed the most important test for an outside centre.
I do agree with this - I thought it was a bad mistake. But from my observation he actually normally has good hands and has demonstrated a that on a number of occaisons with the Reds. I'm sure he'll learn from the mistake.The issue with Taps bombing the try is that setting up the man outside is the 'bread and butter ' of the traditional outside centre.
I don't think Phipps was horrendous, but I don't think he's up to test level. He's too inconsistent, too erratic, with his passing and decision making. The point made above about the lack of rhythm in his game is a good one, it makes life harder for the players around him - Beale in particular.
Tapanui had a bad day at the office. We all have them. It didn't cost us the test.
I am sure that he is not that stupid as to think that he had a good day and there is nothing he needs to do to "lift his game".
Cut him some slack. He will be better for the experience of this match.
If he continues to have bad ones, then rexamine his worth.
We won. Wouldn't think so on the basis of some comments here.
How is applauding the team for grinding out a tough win in exceptionally difficult circumstances, the same as accepting mediocrity? It was a poor game, but the Wallabies were far from mediocre.
If you could afford to give your country just a small part of the adulation you have for your franchise, then you wouldn't sound quite so ridiculous.