ACR
Desmond Connor (43)
just imagine the defending player ripping the ball off an attacking player outside of his (the defender's) 22 and then passing back inside his 22. If they called him the attacker there would be even more confusion because why would you call someone near his own 22 the attacker?
I consider the attacker to be the person in possession of the ball, field position irrelevant. What about when the defending player doesn't touch the ball?
The attacking team takes a ruck outside their own 22, next phase they are tackled in their own 22, thus they can now kick the ball out on the full? This is without the 'defender' ever touching the ball.
That doesn't sound right, so does that rule you quoted only apply to when the defending team somehow turns over possession, takes it back, takes a tackle, then can kick out?
Side note: Israel Dagg permenately has his mouth open, does this affect this rule in any way?
Side side note: I've over thought this.
CONCLUSION: I've cleared this up. Went to the IRB website and looked at the laws, they consider someone in their own half whether in possession or not to be the defender. e.g. "When a defending team throws the ball into a scrum or lineout outside that team’s 22"
So the above in Blue is correct.
They have the ball, why are they the defender?