Search results

Game development workforce was increased by 50% Sent from my D5833 using Tapatalk

It's nearly 20% (17%) fewer games Edit - done my sums wrong - see Braveheart below

That'd be RugbyWA's injunction in action then......

How did SANZAAR convince their broadcast partners to pay the same for much less content? How did Pulver/SAFA convince SANZAAR that the distributions should remain the same despite supporting fewer teams? Both of these suggest to me that Super Rugby - and especially the "lower rating games"...

Last year's ARU agreement with the force complicates that a bit - the ARU own the intellectual property of the Force and all of the players, staff and coaches are actually ARU employees. They probably can't become insolvent as the ARU acted before it happened. Interesting to see what exactly...

The Jaguars would probably claim they have a fair bit of connection with the third A there in SANZAAR IS! ;) Sent from my D5833 using Tapatalk

Brett Impey made this statement SANZAAR is delighted that its major broadcast partners have after due consideration agreed to the restructured format within the existing broadcast agreements. Our broadcast partners are an important stakeholder and their vision for Super Rugby moving forward is...

How much in today's money do you reckon the AFL have spent on the Lions and Swans collectively in the last 35 years Sent from my D5833 using Tapatalk

Annual report and financial statement is out Pdf is here https://issuu.com/australianrugbyunion/docs/high_res_copy_of_annual_report_-_op Headline numbers Big rise in revenue from the new broadcast deal and non-world cup year test match program. Expenses up as well for the pro game, but big...

And @mediaweekaus comes good! Force v Kings - 34k

Force v Kings - No rating Unfortunately this one didn't make the Top 20 programs so no rating so far. Might get one from other sources later. The Tassie Supercars took up a lot of spaces in the top 20 so the limit was fairly high. Crowd was 8474

They may be strategically incompetent, but the board isn't stupid. I imagine the smaller unions will see a relatively small, but significant and vital for them increase in funding contingent on this proposal making it through the AGM

Each of the Super Rugby teams requires funding of approx $5.5m - $8m a year. The broadcaster agreements will not be changed under the new arrangement. Revenue stays the same So what the ARU gains is an additional $5m+ or so each year. As others have said, that means a strengthening of the...

Pure speculation here, but removing one of the Super Rugby teams would also involve removing one of the Members of the ARU I'd imagine that can't be done without a full vote of all of the members. The AGM is on Tuesday, so I'd imagine that's when it would be done. It's probably also a change...

Delegates of each of the member organisations will be there. One vote each for the eight member unions – QLD, NSW, ACT, VIC, TAS, SA, WA, NT. One vote each for union with over 50,000 registered players – currently two (NSW, QLD). One vote for each Super Rugby team – Waratahs, Brumbies, Rebels...

While SUper rugby in this country implodes, the Aviva premiership players and coaches are in "open revolt" over the proposed new 11 month season. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11835162

Brumbies have released a statement https://www.brumbies.com.au/2017/04/plus500-brumbies-statement-sanzaar-announcement/ Sent from my D5833 using Tapatalk

To be fair to Duncan P, he has one of the highest tackle counts in the comp so his success % is pretty high, over 85%. Hunt's at 75%, Talakai at 77%, Kerevi at 72% Kerevi's got the most missed tackles in the comp

Hurricanes v Waratahs - 70k Brumbies v Reds - 53k Highlanders v Blues - 48k

Most penalised for the Reds Kane Douglas - 9 Talakai - 6 Tupou - 5 Smith - 5 Paiaaua - 4 Vanzati - 4 Slipper - 4 Faagasse - 4 Higgers - 4 Missed Tackles Kerevi - 17 Piaaua - 13 Talakai -10 HUnt - 10 Nabuli - 9 Perese - 7 Douglas - 7 Smith - 7 Tupou - 7 Korcyz - 7 Higgenbotham - 7