Search results

Only a small percentage of 10's can play flat. If you want your 10 to play flat,then change your 10.

10 points is your problem. That won't win many games in this comp. Apart from the odd penalty try from a dominant scrum,it's not really obvious where you could have got the extra points required to win a game of footy. Hard times for Reds fans.....

Not if you are a Reds supporter:)

Not if he lasts the season!

I'm disappointed Speight is not there. All he needs is miles on the clock. But they keep picking Kingston. Comparing Kingston to Speight, is like comparing Simpsons donkey to Black Caviar.

Huh? Someone i suggesting that the Reds have an advantage with their game plan? You were otherwise engaged all of 2015?

It's a long bow comparing the 2011 Reds to the current rabble.:)

I know that the field has to be vacant for either 60 or 90 minutes before kickoff in Super games. I remember a few years ago getting a phone call from a frustrated parent,who was locked out of the Stadium,as the Schoolboy 'curtain raiser' game kicked off before the gates opened.

I reckon if Reds can turn this into an arm wrestle they have a chance in this,and on that basis I've taken the $5. Sure as eggs,RG will decide this is the week that every play comes off their 10,in which case it will be Tahs by 50.

Mate,they averaged 20k there last year. And things don't look like they are going any better on the field this year. They need bums on seats.

That's going to put a few noses out of joint in the squad. Can't see them being allowed to vote him off the island a second time!

Oh really? That's totally opposite to what I understood. Then fuck them. Go your hardest Reds!

were they Reds memberships or Ballymore memberships? The Reds admin have treated them as though they were Reds memberships for the twenty odd years they have been at Suncorp. so by their behaviour,they have accepted these memberships were not restricted to Ballymore. so,if they had a case...

it shouldn't be a financial decision. It's a moral issue. the Reds were desperate for cash,they offered a lifetime of best seats in the house. Now that things are no longer desperate,they are refusing to hold up their end of the deal. That's the issue.

Didn't I read on one of the threads recently that all comps/trials have to be sanctioned by the governing body? Makes hardball tactics by clubs redundant doesn't it?

My understanding is that it was a one off payment for a lifetime of "the best seats in the house" And that the Reds have reclassified a B section as category A,to meet their obligations.Requiring 'lifetime members' to pay $40 per game or similar to book a seat in what were previously free seats...

but it's this administration that are not honouring existing contracts. Whether they now think lifetime memberships are a bad idea,is irrelevant. The members accepted a deal in good faith. The Reds should honour that deal in good faith, no matter how much they have to grind their teeth. A deal...

Too harsh. He made 3 points. QC (Quade Cooper) citizenship clearly is no Reds issue,there were plenty of others complaining about the trial jerseys without being ridiculed. And the Reds trying to 'reclassify' the lifetime memberships is worthy of criticism.

Really? Which clubs? the SS clubs that have been funding the 4 franchises in Sydney? That's most of them!

Only if it's ok if your 15 can't kick.