Search results

The Tahs who give a shit are going ok. Problem is there are only 3 of them

No need to look at the round the neck job there on vailanu?

You'd hope so because if they manage to convict him on that one only it's peak WR (World Rugby) farcical.

If the only footage available is the one I have seen then nothing SHOULD happen either. I'm happy to assess any other footage on its merits but no way can they find him guilty on that footage alone.

This isn't a direct response to your post but the topic has changed so I'm just using yours to go back to this subject. In the interest of the paying public (the people who generate the revenue for the code) WR (World Rugby) need to make the laws less complicated, not more. The maul laws should be in...

I’m confused by the whole thing. If they’re injured and considered integral they should be on the rehab list with the other 3 blokes. If they are dropped their names shouldn’t even be on the piece of paper. That bottom section should not even be there.

If you were going to go full retro back to the days of left and right flankers and a bustling 8 then our best back row would be Gleeson, Samu, Valetini. However we need a line out option in there, so that brings Ned or Jed into the calcs, and they would be balanced with Hooper. Thus I don’t...

They don’t go back 19 phases there to find all the blatantly offside Brumbies players do they, nah, penalty try and a yellow

It’s probably just the 3 of us still watching. Fuck knows why. Garbage.

TMO going back 19 phases to find a (marginal) Drua infringement

So you can have 5 attacking players all offside taking out all the defending players, laying out a red carpet for Lonergan 10m behind them and somehow that’s legal?

I can't see him picking both Quade and Foley as O/S picks, and I wouldn't be surprised if he picks Foley ahead of Quade purely because he's much less of an injury risk. Maybe one of them will sign for an Aussie franchise next year before the RWC, that would solve that problem - Foley would be a...

Peter Fitzsimmons?

Or Rod Macqueen. Or Bob Dwyer. Could be any number of people really.

Blythe you fuck-knuckle - I have both you and Corey Toole in my fantasy team. There‘s a bit of chat on other socials that the Reds don’t look up to it physically - in the dressing room, I.e. they aren’t conditioned

Re Tate - and Jake Gordon - I would suspect they received similar phone calls. Something along the lines of 'we obviously need a 3rd halfback in the squad but you're not doing it for me right now'. The 3rd one cant be Louwrens or Simpson, and I doubt the understudies at the Reds and Tahs are...

I think it would depend on what message Eddie has conveyed to him directly and how far off the squad he is - you would think he is literally one back row injury/suspension away.

I’ve just been browsing the laws, and whilst I’ll concede I haven’t had a thorough look there are 2 things I can’t find - the first is a specific reference to ‘tackling’ the ball carrier. The second is I can’t find anything that specifies the sanction should be a yellow card - if it was a...

That was my read on it as well

That’s what I was referring to?