Search results

Lol, of course

This takes the cake, fuck me. Feel like I'm having a stroke

Nah, too many Randwick sympathisers who partake in Eddie's circlejerk

Never have I wanted an Aus v Japan fixture at Suncorp more in more life. The reception for Eddie would be rapturous.

If Twiggy were to fund it, as a business case, it would be a very hard sell to exclude the significantly higher drawing power of known players.

Ay? There's always a pretty consistent torrent of commentary around his passing and kicking - maybe less-so recently with White and Gordon shitting the bed. On that, I don't really subscribe to the idea that McDermott's game is poor in these areas - again, particularly in comparison to other...

Issak Fines-Leleiwasa? He's 28 - three years older than Tate. Agreed he was solid though - a shame that he'll no doubt end up benched for White

Genuine Q - is it possible to scrummage (and other situations which result in studs digging into the turf) on synthetic?

Super effective

Creighton’s looking a lot more confident and comfortable than 12mo ago - love to see it (the caveat being he’s not at 10)

Yep, you can see a clear acceleration and rotation of his shoulders and hips, as well as the forearm and elbow being driven out laterally - regardless if it was an intentional result, it was definitely an intentional movement

He'll weather this storm I reckon - the media aren't going that hard at him, as they're too busy rightfully dunking on Eddie. Next time it goes tits up could be another story, however

Seems to lend credence to speculation around abysmal comms, senior players challenging ‘the vision’, and diabolical strategy decisions. As someone else mentioned yesterday, one individual doesn’t make or break an organisation’s performance; however, in this instance, it seems like Supreme...

I think it's fair to assume that one of the review's core recommendations is likely to focus on the need for alignment (and improvement) of high performance programs across the country - i.e., the central tenet to RA's proposed model.

Is that not, in all likelihood, a presumably valid conclusion though?

From the release:

It's understandable that RUPA would have representation on the panel. There's no indication that Harrison is overseeing proceedings from what I've read. Darlene Harrison's CV is quite impressive - seems a great person to have onboard. I'm unsure what Andrew Slack brings to the table, over and...

QC (Quade Cooper) with a bit of a receipt - reads like something from a snake oil merchant on LinkedIn, but he's not too far off