Sandpit Fan
Nev Cottrell (35)
The opposite holds true with the same logic; those who blindly support all Australian provinces can't 'expect anyone to take their opinions on Australian players and coaches seriously. Basically you've just admitted you can't be anything but biased.'
This thread is going in some interesting directions.
Serious question antipodean: I'm curious about the logic you use to arrive at the statement above. We see a lot of threads here (ok, every thread) on the merits of various players degenerate into state based bias. Reds supporters will talk up Higginbotham as the most deserving 6 in the country, while
People who support their favourite province and also support the other provinces (I don't think anyone "blindly" supports all Aussie provinces) when they are playing other teams are more likely to be open to recognising the merits of other provincial players, simply because they are not automatically marking them down because of who they play for. Gaggers statement makes sense - I can't see how you can argue the reverse. If you say they are biased, who are they biased in favour of?
Personally, if the Tahs or Brumbies were in the finals, and the Reds weren't, I'd be right behind them. That wouldn't stop me taking the the piss out of any of their supporters if the opportunity came up - the provincial rivalry is still there, but better to have an Aussie team take the silverware than anyone else. The RL comparison doesn't really stand up for mine, the Warriors are the only non-Australian team in the competition, so support will be more related to player/playing style/ etc.
Not having a go at you, just interested in the reasoning behind the comment.