kiap
Steve Williams (59)
Fair call.recent examples where I think people are pushing the barrow a bit far:
SA priority is SA. No argument there.South African games should be broadcast at times better suited to Australian viewers.
To be fair, this was first raised in NZ - not the other way round.NZRU should allow their players to sign for Australian teams while retaining their All Blacks eligibility
A Trans-Tasman competition should comprise 'x'
What NZ does is up to them. Stick to your NPC/Mitre 10. It's good for what it is.
And personally, I don't think a Trans-Tasman option (as a 4 to 6 month comp) will be the replacement for Super Rugby. Unlikely to be competitive in the short term/next 2-3 years.
A better Australian option would be to play the 5 Aus teams + Fiji and/or maybe a Japanese side for 50-60% of the season in our own comp.
Best of those teams (or even a few combined) get to play in a next level champ cup (supe 2.0, low fat). Two months duration max, NZ teams involved, and SA/Arg/Aus/Fij/Jpn and perhaps other teams competing.