wamberal
Phil Kearns (64)
Foxtel representative?
Village idiot (That's Mosman Village of course). Or maybe Court Jester.
Foxtel representative?
How much of this has to do with society absolutely scalding those who stick out? As a result, clubs across the globe spend a considerable amount of time training their players how to answer questions without causing any issues.
Hell, have a watch of 'The Last Dance' and see how arguably the best Basketball team interacted with the media and other players. Huge difference just in 20 years.
In saying that, over the last couple of months and year, clubs have been allowing players to take over their social media accounts and give us a glimpse inside on who they really are. In recent memory, the Smith Twins, Tupou, Liam Wright, Johno Lance have all shown some type of shenanigans they do on their team etc
The last 'larger' than life personality that fits your bill that I can think of is Wendel Sailor. That first game at Suncorp after he left the Reds for the Waratahs was packed and everyone gave it to him. The likes of Kurtley Beale doesn't fit the mould as he just comes off as an entitled twat rather than a larikan like Dell.
We have no narratives, we have no personalities, we have no villains, we have no heroes. We need to a better job of promoting our players and their personalities, and they need to work on actually fucking having one.
A Champions League style event has more going for it. There have been advocates of it for some time.Maybe. The comp described by Geerob in today's herald has some appeal. Might be the best of both worlds - local comp for three months then a Champions League style event to get a bit of international competition happening.
My issue with that is I reckon we'd get sick of Aussie conference games after six weeks. The last month of that comp will drag on.
We have no narratives, we have no personalities, we have no villains, we have no heroes. We need to a better job of promoting our players and their personalities, and they need to work on actually fucking having one.
Rugby's great appeal is that it is an international game but Super Rugby and TRC has actually watered this down this element for players and spectators. Seasons become repetitive, playing the same team with the same players and going to the same locations.
Really? Then how would you explain the success of the NRL and AFL? Being that it's the same teams. In the same locations playing with largely the same players year on year.
They have 16 or 18 teams and have been going for over 100 years.
The tribalism is core to that and isn't something that can be created in any short period of time.
A Champions League style event has more going for it. There have been advocates of it for some time.
Geerob's article is (by necessity) vague on detail.
The use of the term 'conferences' is interesting if, say, there are no more Indian Ocean flights in the regular season.
I don't actually care about semantics - call them whatever you want - but moving past the old concept opens possibilities. Teams per 'conference', for instance, can be adjustable locally.
Really? Then how would you explain the success of the NRL and AFL? Being that it's the same teams. In the same locations playing with largely the same players year on year.
Yep. They care about the teams they are playing. And the ratings suggest that Australian Rugby fans care most about playing other Australian teams.
League isn't a good comparison because SOO is the height of their game, whereas International Rugby is the height of our game. The Paul Gallen's exist, just in foreign countries: Owen Farrell, Itoje, Hartley, Quade Cooper, Botha, Marler, Huget all players that the fans love to hate.
No League fan gives a fuck about any league NZ/English player.
But they (or we) do not care enough, do we? That's the crux of it, for me.
League suffers because of it's players propensity to get into trouble off the field. The backgrounds that provide interesting stories can also provide issues with addiction, violence, mental health and disrespect for others.
This costs the game sponsors and it costs the game support (from women especially). It detracts from what happens on the field, without fail every year.
I also think one of our problems in terms of getting people interested in teams is the players themselves.
I went to Shore, and all of the guys in my year who played representative football are beige. They are "good blokes" in so far as they have never upset or differentiated themselves from the rest of the tribe of "good blokes".
Could you ever imagine these blokes having the type of banter that you'd see on the Footy Show of yesteryear?
We have no narratives, we have no personalities, we have no villains, we have no heroes. We need to a better job of promoting our players and their personalities, and they need to work on actually fucking having one.
True, and the teams have not done a great job of promoting the personalities. Why do my kids care about Dan Ricciardo moving from Renault to McLaren in F1? Because they got to know the personalities through the Netflix doco. Something like that would be great, but it doesn't even need that level of investment. 10 or 15 years ago, it was the Tah Talk podcast that really made me a committed Tahs supporter, getting to know the people off the field, especially the fringe players and coaches. That sort of thing, done consistently and well, is so important.