Derpus
Nathan Sharpe (72)
why would this be presented?
https://au.sports.yahoo.com/rugby/a/36811208/western-force-wins-right-to-appeal-axing/
not exactly a point of law.
From sh tina tina(GAGR poster)
That then lead the discussion about the "at least" term used in the "renegotiated" agreement - being "at least 15 teams" not stipulating it couldn't be more than 15, just that it had to be 15 at the least.
It might be relevant to an argument about a point of law. Doesn't seem like it though.