It's funny the different reporting of what has transpired today with regards to the legal proceedings.
I am yet to see the court documents or the order, but by the sounds of it there has been a court date set for next week and some form of order (most likely by consent) to not proceed with any actions until at least the outcome of next week's hearing or until further order.
Am reading reports the force CEO mark sindeberry is frontrunner for pulvers job. If he gets it does he do a massive about face and help kill off his old club? Would put him in a massive quandry surely.
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
It's funny the different reporting of what has transpired today with regards to the legal proceedings.
I am yet to see the court documents or the order, but by the sounds of it there has been a court date set for next week and some form of order (most likely by consent) to not proceed with any actions until at least the outcome of next week's hearing or until further order.
In at least the case of the Reds and Tahs (not sure about the Brumbies), the original agreements in place gave them a permanent right to a Super Rugby licence.
And the hits keep coming, despite this early claim by Clyne that the pathways would remain in Perth, it's emerged the ARU have made plans to scrap the Spirit as well.
“Western Australia will retain an important place in Australian rugby and the ARU will continue to support youth development programs and the community game in the West,” Clyne said. “There will be a clear pathway for young Western Australian rugby players to reach the highest levels and represent the Wallabies.”
Nekminit
http://www.rugby.com.au/news/2017/08/14/05/36/force-appeal-haylett-petty-colemanMy reading is an injunction is in place to stop any "discontinuation" of the Force or its licence. An appeal has been lodged and a decision as to whether to hear the appeal or not will be made by Wednesday next week.
Then we end up with Super 16 by default, right? The Cheetahs and Kings are gone. Not coming back. Now what?
5 Kiwi
5 Aussie
4 SA
Wolves and Jaguars
Lol.
http://www.rugby.com.au/news/2017/08/14/05/36/force-appeal-haylett-petty-coleman
Seems to be the guts of it. But I'm no legal eagle.
There's been some speculation that if Australia fail to cut a team then the sunwolves will be turfed, but the longer it takes the more likely it is that we'll have a 16 team comp next year.So here is what I am trying to work out. Apologies if this has been answered but.
Let's say the High Court of the land tells the ARU that it cannot turf either the Force or Rebels and that they are legally obliged to keep them in the comp, what then?
So now the ARU goes back to SANZAR and says nope boys sorry, even though we agreed to get rid of one, wer'e obliged to honor their contracts and they are still in.
Then we end up with Super 16 by default, right? The Cheetahs and Kings are gone. Not coming back. Now what?
5 Kiwi
5 Aussie
4 SA
Wolves and Jaguars
Lol.
I just don't understand why he ARU wouldn't have quietly made official notification over the weekend to SANZAAR that the Force were out. I suspect SANZAAR are quietly and free from legal restraint finalising the arrangements for the 15 team comp.We're left with Super 16.
And the overwhelming likelihood is that the ARU would find itself responsible for all 11 others sides/4 Governing Unions additional costs, including but not limited to travel, accomodation and loss of broadcast revenue, as I reckon they would get another round of renegotiation.
I just don't understand why he ARU wouldn't have quietly made official notification over the weekend to SANZAAR that the Force were out. I suspect SANZAAR are quietly and free from legal restraint finalising the arrangements for the 15 team comp.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Actually they are officially out pending getting back in, or not. The ARU are prevented from taking further action by the injunction.Well with the injunction the Force are not officially out. So there is that.