D
daz
Guest
Yeah small bikkies.
I absolutely agree. He wouldn't even feel the speed-bump as the small change fell out of his pocket.
Yeah small bikkies.
Twiggy might be a bit short this year.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-...ve-title-determination-twiggy-forrest/8727140
The Federal Court has recognised an exclusive native title claim over land on which Fortescue Metals Group's $280 billion Solomon mine sits in WA's ore-rich Pilbara region, potentially allowing the group to sue Andrew Forrest's company for millions of dollars in compensation.
Tbh it wouldn't touch the sides of his operation.
The only one of the Australian franchises whose name has any tradition is the Waratahs. And sadly that name has now lost all its cachet. It's worth nothing.
That's always been my position too. With the ever increasing wage discrepancies a and time zone issues, long term Aus pro-rugby is stuffed, it's all just eeking out a way to survive for as long as possible until it happens.No figures to back this up, but I can't see Super Rugby getting to 2019 in Australia with crowds and interest like we've had. Something has to give.
We only have as many professionals in this country as we do because of the income of Super Rugby. If the crowds watching it say no, as they have, Super Rugby goes away, our best go overseas, the rest become semi pro at best in some NRC on 7mate which replaces Super Rugby.
It's almost A-League like in that regard, those at the start and end of their careers play at home, the prime guys are overseas.
Just a prediction if something doesn't shake loose and I don't see what can to be honest.
We have to face the awful fact that Soup has just not captured the sporting public's imagination. Not sure exactly why, although it is pretty obvious that some really stupid mistakes were made, like trying to rely on just a non-specific team name (no geographical markers at all), and allowing the Auckland team to use the name "Blues", when that colour really should have been quarantined because of its meaning in the Australian context.
LOL. The competition doesn't revolve around Australia.
We have to face the awful fact that Soup has just not captured the sporting public's imagination. Not sure exactly why, although it is pretty obvious that some really stupid mistakes were made, like trying to rely on just a non-specific team name (no geographical markers at all), and allowing the Auckland team to use the name "Blues", when that colour really should have been quarantined because of its meaning in the Australian context.
The entrance of the Sunwolves and the Jaguares was just a little sideshow, in one way, but it just made the whole business less and less comprehensible to the potential viewer.
People watch sport for a variety of reasons, but the best reason is if a viewer cares about the result. Ideally, hates one team, and loves the other, in the contest.
Most viewers either do not know, or worse still, do not care, who the contestants are in the vast majority of Soup contests.
That Is one reason that I have promoted the idea of using existing clubs in a domestic competition. At least some of them have some history, and some tradition.
The only one of the Australian franchises whose name has any tradition is the Waratahs. And sadly that name has now lost all its cachet. It's worth nothing.
No figures to back this up, but I can't see Super Rugby getting to 2019 in Australia with crowds and interest like we've had. Something has to give.
We only have as many professionals in this country as we do because of the income of Super Rugby. If the crowds watching it say no, as they have, Super Rugby goes away, our best go overseas, the rest become semi pro at best in some NRC on 7mate which replaces Super Rugby.
It's almost A-League like in that regard, those at the start and end of their careers play at home, the prime guys are overseas.
Just a prediction if something doesn't shake loose and I don't see what can to be honest.
In addition to all of the other issues our game is struggling with, I have concerns that the Pay TV sector will not be viable enough to continue to pay the sponsorship for Super Rugby. Foxtel has so much additional competition that charge subscriptions of $10 per month whereas a Foxtel package with the Rugby comes in at $70. Am guessing Foxtel will struggle to hold onto subscribers resulting in cost cutting.
For mine, its all the more reason that the grassroots should be nurtured as without Foxtel funding Super Rugby might be stuffed, and what then would be left?
In addition to all of the other issues our game is struggling with, I have concerns that the Pay TV sector will not be viable enough to continue to pay the sponsorship for Super Rugby. Foxtel has so much additional competition that charge subscriptions of $10 per month whereas a Foxtel package with the Rugby comes in at $70. Am guessing Foxtel will struggle to hold onto subscribers resulting in cost cutting.
For mine, its all the more reason that the grassroots should be nurtured as without Foxtel funding Super Rugby might be stuffed, and what then would be left?
Poor performance is hurting Super Rugby at present but it's the very nature of the competition that allows for that to occur. Think about all our most popular leagues. The are all domestic. Wamberal mentions loss of brand recognition as a key issue which could be an issue but the biggest one is that outside of the derbies no one really cares about who any of the Aus teams are playing week to week as there is no common link.
Our market only cares about our domestic rivalries. And that's what we should be looking toward as well. In essence we need to do an A-League.
I still think the NRC is a solid structure for this with a little tweaking.
I don't know what the answer is but it is not the current Super Rugby crap we are fed...I can't see how it is going to get better by limping on until end of the current broadcast deal as will just create further damage and loss of fan support which will make it harder to re-generate even with a new completion from 2020.
South Africa has a plan B with pro 12 whilst our incredibly inept ARU appears to have NFI...I use to try and be polite and balanced towards the ARU but now I hold them in complete contempt for what they have done to rugby in this country.
Poor performance is hurting Super Rugby at present but it's the very nature of the competition that allows for that to occur. Think about all our most popular leagues. The are all domestic. Wamberal mentions loss of brand recognition as a key issue which could be an issue but the biggest one is that outside of the derbies no one really cares about who any of the Aus teams are playing week to week as there is no common link.
Our market only cares about our domestic rivalries. And that's what we should be looking toward as well. In essence we need to do an A-League.
I still think the NRC is a solid structure for this with a little tweaking.
I don't know what the answer is but it is not the current Super Rugby crap we are fed...I can't see how it is going to get better by limping on until end of the current broadcast deal as will just create further damage and loss of fan support which will make it harder to re-generate even with a new completion from 2020.
South Africa has a plan B with pro 12 whilst our incredibly inept ARU appears to have NFI...I use to try and be polite and balanced towards the ARU but now I hold them in complete contempt for what they have done to rugby in this country.