Inside Shoulder
Nathan Sharpe (72)
There is only 300 pages of posts here with people saying exactly that.
Sent from my F3115 using Tapatalk
aha - so the solution must lie in the other 33 pages - if only we knew which one
There is only 300 pages of posts here with people saying exactly that.
Sent from my F3115 using Tapatalk
Make sure your idea is only known by the creators/keep it extremely private. Then when approaching the ARU, make them sign a confidentiality agreement before you show them. Your idea would have to be novel enough that the ARU wouldn't/couldn't have reasonably dreamt it up.Just a hypothetical question purely out of curiosity for the legal minds out there:
Say a bunch of people from this forum came up with a an idea for a domestic comp, and took it to the powers, and they thought it was such a good idea that it was implemented. Is there a way that the said bunch of people could protect said idea prior to taking it to the powers so that they effectively owned the rights to the new competition?
Fixed.Summary of last page:
A Red supporter asking to be cut
A Tahs Supporter asking to be cut
A Force supporter asking to be cut
Prediction for next page:
ARU are dickheads
Provinces are no better
Shute Shield is on itself
I know this is not got a lot to do with this discussion, but was in car with radio on and some leaguies were discussing their game, they seemed to think NRL has stuffed game up, they had a plan in 2012 tthat was going to increase crowds at games etc etc, but numbers are down, the grassroots of the game are feeling let down with no support, and clubs have no confidence in the NRL board. Hell doesn't that sound familiar?? Is it all sports in Aus (and around the world) that are off side with stakeholders or is it just that stakeholders expect to much?
Cheika was on Offisders on ABC today.
Suggested that the ARU are looking after the interests of rugby in Australia, whereas (as I understood him) it might be said that in the past they had endeavoured too cater for the interests of both oz rugby and their joint venture partners in super rugby.
Depends which league identities are talking.
Broadcasting more games is not going to improve Crowds, IMO.
Also made a hardly veiled observation that the problems the ARU/rugby is facing is in the minds of the rugby league journalists. Noticeable too that he had a very smug look on him as he leant as far back in the chair as was possible after answering each question.
Well I think it was Girdler, Tallis, though I not sure as I don't follow the game. I wasn't defending anyone or anything,just struck me not many are happy with anyone that runs their sport!
I know this is not got a lot to do with this discussion, but was in car with radio on and some leaguies were discussing their game, they seemed to think NRL has stuffed game up, they had a plan in 2012 tthat was going to increase crowds at games etc etc, but numbers are down, the grassroots of the game are feeling let down with no support, and clubs have no confidence in the NRL board. Hell doesn't that sound familiar?? Is it all sports in Aus (and around the world) that are off side with stakeholders or is it just that stakeholders expect to much?
Also made a hardly veiled observation that the problems the ARU/rugby is facing is in the minds of the rugby league journalists. Noticeable too that he had a very smug look on him as he leant as far back in the chair as was possible after answering each question.
And he can be smug. Except after every time EJ (Eddie Jones) out-coaches him, then we see the other side.
I'll bet he's looking forward to locking coaching horns with Richard Graham (backs coach of Georgia) at RWC 2019.
And as an aside, I noted that in Melbourne last night we had "heavy dew" rather than ordinary dew, which as per usual was used to explain the poor handling.
What happened in Melbourne?
Where would I be without you to correct my every error and misstep? My own private proof-reader.
Of course the match was in Canberra.