JOC (James O'Connor) to fullback?I thought we picked a team that lacked size in both forwards and backs. I hoped we would play an innovative, fast game plan to maybe take advantage of this. We did not.
Outmuscled in every facet. Need more punch from the backrow- both Mowen and MMM were very poor. Fardy, maybe McCalman should be considered.
In the backs- come in Honey Badger. Move JOC (James O'Connor) to fullback, Mogg back to the bench. Need some physicality, some mongrel, some line-bending.
.
I know someone has already mentioned it, but JOC (James O'Connor)'s positioning was twice attributable to a AB's try, he may be talented but he hasn't been playing wing for quite a while and struggled there tonight.
We need some more size in the backline, id like to see Tomane back in the team and Izzy needs to be injected much much more.
JOC (James O'Connor) to fullback?
He plays shit at 10, and they sack the coach.
He plays shit at 11, and now he gets moved to fullback?
He should ride the pine or go surfing.
There is no basis for selecting him in the run on side.
At all.
Sack the 15 as well.
If he is not confident in his skill set to perform at that level,he is of no use.
How long did they sign Link for?
Tomane? Surely Cummins would be the best option for a sizeable bruiser?
How many times did he come in off his man?
It's no coincidence his man scored 3 tries tonight.
It's Test footy,you can't have anyone who leaks that many points.
When he kicks poorly at 15, do we then pick him at 12?
He looked very assured wherever he was. He just wasn't where he was supposed to be a lot of the time. It was no accident the AB's targeted his wing. Not saying Mogg looked assured though.JOC (James O'Connor) was the only back to consistently threaten the line tonight.
Made a few defensive errors, but he certainly wasnt alone there.
Looked far more assured than Mogg.
.
apart from stats indicating that Tomane is 6kg heavier, i actually like his style of play more, he seems to look for work more similar to Ioane, where as Cummins seems to peg himself on the wing more but he is a very good finisher.
See ya, fucktard.
Well on two of Smith's tries he was hardly culpable- one was from a spilled ruck ball, the other a simple overlap.
He came in a couple of times, sure. But it was his first time playing wing in ages, so it is kind of understandable. Still errors, but he provides more than enough upside that he should be kept.
.
Written elsewhere, but my first thoughts
I'm still not sure what the point of Simmons is - he's good at the lineout and restarts but apart from that. Seriously. What's the point of him? He's invisible, and not in the good way.
Ash I know what you're saying, and the stats might completely disagree with my impression, but he just doesn't seem to have any impact on a game. He doesn't make things happen. And not in an x-factor way either, he just never seems to be able to take the game by the scruff of the neck and make big plays when it counts. He's just meh.
But if any of the back 3 deserve criticism it should be Folau, for being absent the entire game and contributing absolutely nothing.....
No, no, it's Mogg. He was by far the worst. Let's not mince words here- he had a fucking shocker, and frankly deserves to be dropped.
Folau stayed on his wing almost the entire night, and very little play came his way (Savea barely touched the ball as well). Whether he was told to stay out there I don't know, but I would have liked to have seen him go looking for a bit of work.