Done that
Ron Walden (29)
The initial constituents of this team were Parramatta ,Penrith,West Harbour,Eastwood(North West) & Southern Districts(South West ).I'm aligned with The Rams. I nominally support Parramatta and Penrith, but place the support of rugby at the top of the chain.
1) no it doesn't: GREATER Sydney Rams.
2) Eastwood is west. Maybe they don't deserve quite that many players, but if you want success, add weight to each club's position on the table and check again.
I live in Western Sydney and played subbies for five years out here, including committee stints and dealing directly with the rugby hierarchy including referees. I know the frustration of basically being ignored because we don't have the money, or the old school connections, or the facilities established a century ago that mean we are subject to the whims of LGA.
But if we keep sitting in our pile of mud and bitching about HOW something should happen, we are no better than Poido or Papworth in believing that Club rugby will see the game prosper in this nation.
We need a third tier established, and in time the game can grow outwards and upwards, and bring Western Sydney into the fold as the cradle of life ahead of the GPS system.
They will play their games at Parramatta.
If you don't believe this represents Western Sydney & was intended to so do,indicates your perceptions & mine are obviously not the same.
I don't agree that because Eastwood is the most successful team of those mentioned above,that few players from the other clubs would not make it at the Eastwood club.Take a look
at the number of players who have gone to Eastwood in recent years from those other clubs & have succeeded,(a large number of West Harbour players come to mind).
You are not Robinson Crusoe in your support of Rugby ,but I note that you have the Parramatta logo attached to your posts .Based on your altruistic logic you should have the logos of all the
clubs highlighted perhaps ?
To suggest that this is an opportunity to develop some "tribalism" & consequently added interest & support of this team as I have suggested it is,is "bitching",also highlights the difference
between you & I ,I am afraid.Not to suggest that there are apparent deficiencies in the existing model ,presumes that you are in total agreement with it as it stands.
I see tribalism & hence identification with a team , as an important part of garnering support for this team,& I believe that is best achieved in this case by including players of appropriate
standard & reasonable numbers from all the clubs representing Western Sydney.Not to do so will limit the support & interest which supporters in the West will have in this team,but
also,as I have suggested above, create a negative impression in the minds of players in the clubs which have not been so generously looked upon by the selectors,with obvious consequences.
The Wallabies don't mysteriously appear out of nowhere.Clearly national teams depend, ultimately ,on the existence of a strong & viable club base.The same is true for the Super 15 teams,
& no less true for the development of this "3rd tier" competition.In this sense ,anything which is potentially detrimental for the existing SS clubs should be avoided.This is particularly true
for the struggling clubs in Sydney's West.