It was very good to see the Tahs back up after last week.
The key for me again this week is the aggression, energy and application at the contact, both in attacking tacklers with ball in hand, tackling and accuracy to the ruck. There is a marked difference from last year and certainly years previous. The Tahs backs and Forwards actually seem to want to take the contact. Something in that screams Psycho Grey.
Again this week the big area of concern is both the set pieces IMO. Some will say there is no concern with the scrum, but I feel that there are weaknesses there and Robinson still doesn't look comfortable under the new engage. On that front the Tahs really have to work with Latu on his scrummaging. Against two middle of the road scrummaging teams the Tahs didn't really dominate except in a couple of scrums. I would like to see more. The lineout however is a key concern. TPN has well known and discussed accuracy issues and the Tahs were simply awful in this aspect last night. Perhaps one solution could be to move Potgeiter to 6 when Palu is subbed and retain Hoiles or Dennis at 8 to add another option.
As for the Reds there is not much to say. I expressed significant concerns regarding their defensive systems after their trial matches. That was was seen again last night. I also feel that they got a good win against a poor Brumbies last week and the true measure of their side was seen last night. The tactical approach to the game was very poor IMO with the Tahs back three supplemented by Foley and Beale running back the ball at every chance. The Tahs approach was seen in depth last week, so why would Graham have a plan to look for territory? After the first tries when the Reds game plan was falling apart, in spite of the Tahs lineout woes, they seemed to fall apart and their accuracy, especially at the ruck, disappeared.
I like the approach the Tahs are taking, it is clichéd, but they truly have adopted a one game at a time approach and don't even discuss the competition away from the next match. All focus is on that.