Mate, you're sounding like a broken record.It amazes me how teams get away with so much. Never the force
Mate, you're sounding like a broken record.
Why not expend your energy focusing on why the Force play were so disjointed and could not capitalise on their territory and possession with points.
I agree. We didn't look good at all. No decent set up. The ball did to make it to the wings or even Godwin. We have some work to do. Tahs are probably the best side in the comp on paper an scored a fluke try off the posts so wasn't terrible.Mate, you're sounding like a broken record.
Why not expend your energy focusing on why the Force play were so disjointed and could not capitalise on their territory and possession with points.
It's not his option!!!! It's a scrum!!! Jesus
Wouldn't work. We would get carded all day.And everytime the Force got close to the line the're was a penalty against the tahs. Maybe the Force just need to learn to cheat better
Sent from my HTC_PN071 using Tapatalk
Nope. Scrum. Unless advantage is over or he is the first ref to use that callAiui lost forward going into touch is a scrum/lineout option.
Well, I saw it a few times last year. Must all be part of the conspiracy among the refs launched a few years ago.Nope. Scrum. Unless advantage is over or he is the first ref to use that call
I've only ever seen the refs say no scrum. I've seen players ask for the lineout but refused. It's advantage for the knock on. It comes back to the knock on unless advantage is over.Well, I saw it a few times last year. Must all be part of the conspiracy among the refs launched a few years ago.
No if the force had knock it on than it is an option only thing is they didn't hooper attacked the ball (legally) and he was the one to knock it into touch once again missed by the ref who was not in position to see it but the tj just stood thereNope. Scrum. Unless advantage is over or he is the first ref to use that call