Not as if you ever did anything like that, though.........
- Status
waiopehu oldboy
George Smith (75)
The odd street & locality sign may have found their way into a vehicle in which I may have been a passenger, but where I grew up a wrench, a mate on lookout duty then pretending to take a piss if someone happened to drive past was all it took. Somewhat ironically not many years later I was responsible for ordering signs to replace those some riff-raff wankers had stolen......
Civil signage karma is a bitch with a lot of red tape.
ChargerWA
Mark Loane (55)
If you're good enough, you can collect the whole set.
Hugh Jarse
Rocky Elsom (76)
Wouldn't want to be the council official in charge of signage in Fucking, Austria. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fucking,_Austria
For some unknown reason, it is the most stolen town sign in Europe.
For some unknown reason, it is the most stolen town sign in Europe.
waiopehu oldboy
George Smith (75)
Wouldn't want to be the council official in charge of signage in Fucking, Austria. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fucking,_Austria
For some unknown reason, it is the most stolen town sign in Europe.
For the record, I have never been to Austria.
Hugh Jarse
Rocky Elsom (76)
Is it on the bucket list now?
waiopehu oldboy
George Smith (75)
Way too close to France for my liking.
NEWSFLASH
http://www.news.com.au/sport/rugby/...than-kaplan-says/story-fndpu1x3-1227018055184
Kaplan reckoned the last penalty was awarded in error. What a fucking surprise! Well at least the prick's consistent (that's all we ask of referees), the Tahs would've gone down in another match involving Jonathan and a whistle.
What a numpty, of all people to comment on the Tahs WINNING a match you'd think Kaplan would've kept shtum.
http://www.news.com.au/sport/rugby/...than-kaplan-says/story-fndpu1x3-1227018055184
Kaplan reckoned the last penalty was awarded in error. What a fucking surprise! Well at least the prick's consistent (that's all we ask of referees), the Tahs would've gone down in another match involving Jonathan and a whistle.
What a numpty, of all people to comment on the Tahs WINNING a match you'd think Kaplan would've kept shtum.
TahDan
Cyril Towers (30)
You'd think these headline writers could at least try a little balance...
Kaplan ALSO says that the Nadolo try shouldn't have been awarded later in his analysis, so it's a bit silly them coming up with headlines that make it sounds like the Crusaders were robbed.
TahDan
Cyril Towers (30)
There are two pieces of controversy for the Nadolo try - his foot goes into touch AND he looks like he loses it as he's grounding it. So I reckon it's less than a 50-50 and 9 times out of 10 wouldn't have been awarded.
I disagree. I think in most cases it would have been awarded.
TahDan
Cyril Towers (30)
Well we're both speculating, but I reckon when you have two elements of a potential try that are 50-50 and call it into question, you have to assume that at least one of them disallowed it.
I certainly think it was a significantly more controversial call to the McCaw penalty in any case.
Bullrush
Geoff Shaw (53)
But it's only your opinion that there is any speculation of him losing it.....the only thing that possibly made the try 50/50 is whether his foot went into touch....
TahDan
Cyril Towers (30)
There's separation between his hands and the ball as he hits the ground. Seen those called knock-ons before...
Anyway, it doesn't matter now. Ayoub is an awful ref and this just confirmed how poor his eyesight and judgement are.
Thankfully the Tahs still won in spite of his dodgy call
Bullrush
Geoff Shaw (53)
LOL...so because you don't agree with Ayoub's ruling (you're a Waratah supporter so little surprise really...) then it's just confirmation of his poor eyesight and judgement?!?
No more so than Joubert's terrible last few mins of that game confirming what an average ref he is to those who might hold that opinion.....
- Status