Well, I hate to piss on waratahjesus' stats, but the Blues game drew slightly fewer punters than the Shorks, despite the predicted influx of UnZidders from Bondi, eh?NTA said:That's the beauty of a Saffer team in town - less competition to get a watery cup of piss.
cyclopath said:Well, I hate to piss on waratahjesus' stats, but the Blues game drew slightly fewer punters than the Shorks, despite the predicted influx of UnZidders from Bondi, eh?NTA said:That's the beauty of a Saffer team in town - less competition to get a watery cup of piss.
Certainly not 5000 more. Maybe they went to the AFL? :lmao:
cyclopath said:...Lindo is the self-appointed social secretary for such things...
Understood this is a test run for next years WC in NZ. There will be a Sydney sleep over and wonder what happen to the touchie against the Ferners?Lindommer said:cyclopath said:...Lindo is the self-appointed social secretary for such things...
Well, thanks, Pedallist. If I didn't grasp the initiative for things social in Sydney we'd be no better than Queenslanders. At least I can say we in the Premier State can organise a pissup.
CanadianRugby said:Hate to bring this back to Jake White, but does anyone know what he would actually DO in this new position?
cyclopath said:Well, I hate to piss on waratahjesus' stats, but the Blues game drew slightly fewer punters than the Shorks, despite the predicted influx of UnZidders from Bondi, eh?NTA said:That's the beauty of a Saffer team in town - less competition to get a watery cup of piss.
Certainly not 5000 more. Maybe they went to the AFL? :lmao:
WJ, you know, and I know that you originally raised the issue of Kiwi games drawing more after the Sharks game, not the Lions. What was the attendance at the Sharks game?waratahjesus said:cyclopath said:Well, I hate to piss on waratahjesus' stats, but the Blues game drew slightly fewer punters than the Shorks, despite the predicted influx of UnZidders from Bondi, eh?NTA said:That's the beauty of a Saffer team in town - less competition to get a watery cup of piss.
Certainly not 5000 more. Maybe they went to the AFL? :lmao:
16,878 v lions
20,313 v blues
only 1500 off.
cyclopath said:WJ, you know, and I know that you originally raised the issue of Kiwi games drawing more after the Sharks game, not the Lions. What was the attendance at the Sharks game?waratahjesus said:cyclopath said:Well, I hate to piss on waratahjesus' stats, but the Blues game drew slightly fewer punters than the Shorks, despite the predicted influx of UnZidders from Bondi, eh?NTA said:That's the beauty of a Saffer team in town - less competition to get a watery cup of piss.
Certainly not 5000 more. Maybe they went to the AFL? :lmao:
16,878 v lions
20,313 v blues
only 1500 off.
Checked myself - 20,651 so I apologise, there were 338 more Kiwis than Saffers there. Still can't account for the missing 4,662.
cyclopath said:Well, I hate to piss on waratahjesus' stats, but the Blues game drew slightly fewer punters than the Shorks, despite the predicted influx of UnZidders from Bondi, eh?NTA said:That's the beauty of a Saffer team in town - less competition to get a watery cup of piss.
Certainly not 5000 more. Maybe they went to the AFL? :lmao:
DPK said:$9.60 for a UDL at Canberra Stadium
waratahjesus said:DPK said:$9.60 for a UDL at Canberra Stadium
do they still sell extra dry in the plastic bottles at canberra?
(who the f is drinking a udl at the rugby?)