This is my problem, they get signed early on potential, then they stay on for 10 years because the perception is they are more advanced than any SS prop.
Tilse is in his10?th year as a pro.
I really don't think many SS clubs would pick up the ph if he was available.
Paddy Ryan as well,to a lesser degree.
Put 20 SS props in a pro program,let Tilse & Paddy compete against them on the back of an amateur program, and they would be flogged.
Sandell on an EPS is a good option.
But as we know, the last 5-6 signings are always the most contentious.
Clearly there is a problem where some players are retained when they shouldn't be either because they've advanced to a level within the squad they aren't good enough for or they haven't developed as planned (or both).
The proof will be in the pudding next year in terms of who is retained out of Robinson, Tilse and Ryan and out of those who are retained, how they perform and out of those who aren't, who gets recruited instead.
It seems to me that 2016 is going to be the year the Tahs struggle whilst some young players gain experience but things are pretty well positioned moving forward.
Retaining Beale will be crucial to our future but a core experienced group of Hooper, Folau, Beale, Foley, Phipps, TPN, Horne, Skelton looks good.
A younger group who have been amongst the squad for a while and are showing plenty of promise and are starting to get Super Rugby experience under their belts: Robertson, Latu, Roach, Holloway, Dempsey, Horwitz, Kellaway.
And a young group with hopefully bright futures: Hanigan, Orr, Sandell, Toleafoa, Stewart, Gordon, Jones, Perry.
I think a big part of the issue this year is that some of the old heads like Dennis, Mumm, Robinson, Carraro etc. aren't performing well and it is too big a jump for the guys with no experience coming into the starting XV and matchday 23.
I feel like the team will be in a much better position next year mostly because the younger group will be more experienced and really ready to compete at Super Rugby level.