T
TOCC
Guest
Izzy at 13 opens the door for Karmichael at fullback.. Or a return to fullback for KB (Kurtley Beale)..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Izzy at 13 opens the door for Karmichael at fullback.. Or a return to fullback for KB (Kurtley Beale)..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ok, here's a test for Wallaby coach Michael Chieka.
His star fullback wants to play outside centre for his provincial team. The same position where we have, arguably, our best back currently playing for the Brumbies.
So does Wallaby coach Chieka pick Izzy at 13 (assuming Beale at fullback) for the good of his Tahs, or does he do what's best for the Wallabies and keep Izzy at fullback?
Perhaps the Wallaby coach will ask the Brumby coach to consider playing Kuridrani at 12 in Super Rugby, you know, for the good of the Wallabies?
I'm a little off put by Foley shopping himself around in the media. Could be bias. Does it sit well with you Tahs fans?
http://www.news.com.au/sport/rugby/.../story-fndpt9s1-1227193824332?from=public_rss
or does he do what's best for the Wallabies and keep Izzy at fullback?
I doubt Izzy will play anywhere but fullback for the Waratahs, simply because there isn't a better fullback in the squad. And Adam Ashley-Cooper has that spot pretty much nailed down. The 2014 line-up worked. Cheika's not going to mess with it.
Izzy at 13 for the Wallabies is a non-starter for me as well. Tevita Kuridrani has that spot locked up.
Yeah, Kuridrani had a very high performance last year despite the team's results, he deserves the #13. Perhaps Israel would like to have less responsibility in defense, as the last man (fullback) has a lot of responsibility and not everyone can withstand that pressure.
If Hunt has an extraordinary Super Rugby season at fullback, then Israel will stop being so pretentious. I worry about his body, he has had many injuries and the Wallabies have no luck with that
13 is a much tougher defensive position than 15.
What exactly has Folau done that is pretentious?
Just general awesomeness n stuff.Besides worn a Waratahs jersey and had the brazen gall to win a championship?
Some people are carrying on like Foley said "Yeah fuck the lot of yers! Soon as I get an offer I'm goneski!"
Take a breath, ladies (sorry Shtina - you know I mean them). Half the time you're up these blokes for giving by-the-book answers and not showing any sort of thought or personality like league players ("played hard, done good!"). One of them has the temerity to state the facts as they are with a little honesty and you're all over them like a cheap suit!
13 is a much tougher defensive position than 15.
What exactly has Folau done that is pretentious?
I disagree. 13 is a much harder defensive position technically. Your positioning and reading of the attack is much more difficult.
There's a reason why lots of backs new to rugby union start at fullback before moving into the centres. It tests your one on one tackling and it's certainly true that missed tackles result in tries but putting yourself in the position to make the tackle is easier.
It's fairly widely acknowledged that 13 is the hardest defensive position in the backline.
MHCS, you said you though Izzy wants to move to 13 so he has less responsibility in defence..
As mentioned by Braveheart, 13 is widely accepted as the most difficult defensive position in the back-line. I think most people on this forum would agree with that comment.
If Izzy wants to move to 13 its for reasons beyond having less defensive responsibility.