Sounds like you're letting us down gently, uncle lee.
[As to why I said the teams weren't apples for apples.]
Ha - I was just a bit bemused why all our invited players who were fit were named for the trial and the Rebels named only Super Rugby and EPS guys in their 28.
Since then the penny has dropped. The Tahs have more players from the Wobs EOYT in their squad than the Rebels do; also Fitzpatrick is out for the season, Chapman who replaced him hasn't arrived yet and McCutcheon won't be match fit for quite a while.
Also it looks like they didn't think that Turner was match fit yet, though he has been training well lately, and EPS players Lane and Holloway were not named.
Holloway has been absent for a while and it's a pity that he will miss the trial as he has been impressive in training. Lane was very proppy in December but seemed to be training full on in January - so he must have got a knock.
The Tahs have 12 Wobs and 5 others absent from their squad of 35 players. That would have left them with 18 guys which meant they needed all those 10 invited players named to play in the trial.
Because they had fewer EOYT Wobs and absentees the Rebels were able to name their 28 players from their 35 man squad.
Their 3rd scrummie, Kingi, is absent though and must be injured. I would have given Zacker the whole game and left Phipps on the bench rather than have him start in the 1st half.
Their 1st half team looks like their best side except for missing Beale and Higginbotham. Our part-timers are in for a dose of cruel reality though it should be better for them after oranges.
.