T
Train Without a Station
Guest
A few more attacking players would allow a more diverse game-play.
They're still coached by Michael Foley though!
A few more attacking players would allow a more diverse game-play.
It is funny cos Hooper at the Brumbies never got questioned about his pilfering skills and pretty sure he lead the stats for it in super rugby. The game plan was kick it tackle the crap out of them and get the ball back.. He was awesome at it. Then at the tah's it was Ball in hand. In the wallabies he usually plays with Fardy, who is a good runner but a great onballer 6. So Hooper does less on ball attack and more running.
He'd be awesome if he just cut his hair..
Exactly. Though I'm a younger vintage than you so I don't know who Mike Brierly is.
Disagree. He was arguably the top openside in Australia in 2014.
That being said, he would have been less effective for the Waratahs, much in the same way Hooper would have been less effective for the Force.
But we also need to remember that Pocock, Gill and Robinson all missed a large number of games through injury. In addition, all 3 Rebels openside options ended their seasons with shoulder surgery.
It's not a matter of just picking the bloke who is in the best form today.
Form is important but the Wallabies aren't just a rep team. They are a team with their own season so you need to actually build a team rather than just pick players. Due to that, consideration needs to be paid to last year's form and next years form needs to be considered.
On that basis Hodgson is not by far good enough to hold the starting openside spot. He's a good openside, actually he would probably be a good a international quality openside too. But Hooper was better in 2013, has still been one of the better opensides (though behind Hodgson) in 2014, and at 23 vs 34 or 35, I'll back Hooper to be the better of the two in 2015 too.
Pocock if he stays fit will be the long term Wallaby 7. People have been quick to forget actually just how good he is.
I should clarify, I mean through the full length of this tour for Hodgson. Over a longer period, I would like to see Moore get the captaincy back.
I agree Hodgson was the best 7 in 2014 but you know you got to tread lightly through the Hooper man love around here.
Pocock if he stays fit will be the long term Wallaby 7. People have been quick to forget actually just how good he is.
It's a pity one can't just have an opinion that a player is better without people attaching cheap jibes like this to it, as if it is some irrational cult-following.I should clarify, I mean through the full length of this tour for Hodgson. Over a longer period, I would like to see Moore get the captaincy back.
I agree Hodgson was the best 7 in 2014 but you know you got to tread lightly through the Hooper man love around here.
Pocock if he stays fit will be the long term Wallaby 7. People have been quick to forget actually just how good he is.
Exactly. Though I'm a younger vintage than you so I don't know who Mike Brierly is.
An English cricket captain who averaged 28 with the bat, didn't bowl but won the ashes in his second stint as captain.
In effect he was only in the team for his captaincy and it worked: similar - Reuben Thorn, Black Toddadder
Mike Brearley.
I think he averaged a tick under 23 at test level.
For someone who was picked as a batsman, I think he could have the longest test career without ever scoring a test century.
It's a pity one can't just have an opinion that a player is better without people attaching cheap jibes like this to it, as if it is some irrational cult-following.
I thought you were better than that, Ruggo.
Well he is. As a rugby player he's the equivalent of Vince Vaughn or Mark Wahlberg as actors. Can only play one role.
Being a quality player and being mutli-faceted are not the same thing.
Hooper has been nothing short of inadequate as a Wallaby captain but not really taken to task because of man love.
OK. Here we go again.
Not sure what your definition of a one-dimensional player is, but I see Pocock as an X-factor player. Can X-factor players be one-dimensional?
Hooper has X-factor in attack, does his job on defence.
Pocock has X-factor in defence, does his job on attack.
Just because he doesn't make line-breaks like Hooper doesn't mean he is one-dimensional.