Reddy!
Bob Davidson (42)
Lance Free said:Reddy, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Without the ball that Hodgson snaffles, Genia can do fuck-all with.....
Hmm, it's pretty easy to stand out in a consistently beaten side.
Lance Free said:Reddy, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Without the ball that Hodgson snaffles, Genia can do fuck-all with.....
fatprop said:But if Robinson is wounded, I would start Baxter at THP and Alexander at LHP
Spook said:fatprop said:But if Robinson is wounded, I would start Baxter at THP and Alexander at LHP
Yep, sounds reasonable Fat. Who would be on the bench? Dunning has been poor IMO. Kepu?
fatprop said:Henderson or Kepu would be my choice as LHP coverage, Daley doesn't scrummage well enough yet.
Umm, we do not need a guy playing 5 who doesn't usually; we need a proper lock who knows how to scrum as a lock. Sharpe will be it at this stage.liquor box said:1- Robinson
2 TPN
3- Weekes
4- Mumm
5_ Rocky
6- Higgonbottom
7- Pocock
8- Hoiles
liquor box said:I am now seriously wondering if Gitts will be selected, it is becoming easier each week to find others to fit into a team without him.
Will Deans want a second 5/8 playing at centre or a hard runner?
I would look at
9- Genia
10- Cooper
11- Digby
12- A Fainga
13- AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper)
14- Mitchell
15- Beale
I think Barnes would offer more as a bench player and I would prefer not to have Beale at 15 but he is playing there as a starter and is looking ok. In an ideal world I would have Cameron Shepard at 15 if he gets fit.
1- Robinson
2 TPN
3- Weekes
4- Mumm
5_ Rocky
6- Higgonbottom
7- Pocock
8- Hoiles
My biggest issue is not having an old head in the backs to settle Cooper
It has also occured to me that a very strong U24 side would be possible at the moment.
chief said:Latest prediction.
9. Genia
10. Cooper
11. Mitchell/JOC (James O'Connor)
12. Giteau
13. AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper)
14. Ioane
15. Hynes
No, I don't. Mumm has consistently played his best rugby at lock, and has not played 6 well at Test level at all; Rocky on the other hand IS a 6, and pretty good. Why play them out of position? If Mumm is too small for lock (he isn't), why put Elsom there. He is, remarkably, not bigger. We cannot fuck around with the locks - we have been horribly exposed in the past with locks that scrum poorly behind a dodgy THP. Mumm scrums very well; Sharpe is better too.en_force_er said:I love the lack of mentioning of Rocky at lock which is a big move. I'm not saying I'm not behind it, I honestly think it's the best for everyone (so many good looseys, we need to make space somewhere). I wouldn't play him with Mumm though, they'd be too small.
My Wallaby team would look like:
1. Alexander (can play 1 and 3)
2. TPN (get's nod over Moore because he has more running in him, this is an Aussie strength this year and needs to be used as much as possible)
3. Weekes (can also play 1 and 3)
4. Elsom
5. Sharpe
6. Hodgson (also covers 7 and 8. if lineout struggles with only 2 genuine options, replace with Mumm)
7. Pocock
8. Palu
9. Genia
10. Cooper
11. AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) (to share fullback responsibilities with Hynes. AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) is great at looking for work and was good on the wing during the 07 season)
12. Gits (to rotated in the match 15 with Fainga'a depending on if the game calls for a specialist IC or 2nd 5/8. Gits to cover halfback in a pinch)
13. Digby
14. Mitchell
15. Hynes
16. Moore
17. Robinson
18. Van Humphries (big call but if Rocky is to play lock you need a real "bread and butter" player to back him up if things go pear shaped)
19. Mumm (too small for a test lock but can play there if necessary, mostly to be used at 6)
20. Beale (gets nod over Fainga or Barnes on the bench based on his ability to cover 10, 12 and 15)
21. Mortlock (won't get much time but I think he could be a cool head if needed)
22. O'Connor (has been decent in a bad team and needs to be kept in the fold as a future player)
You guys mightn't like my ideas but I think it would really work.
cyclopath said:No, I don't. Mumm has consistently played his best rugby at lock, and has not played 6 well at Test level at all; Rocky on the other hand IS a 6, and pretty good. Why play them out of position? If Mumm is too small for lock (he isn't), why put Elsom there. He is, remarkably, not bigger. We cannot fuck around with the locks - we have been horribly exposed in the past with locks that scrum poorly behind a dodgy THP. Mumm scrums very well; Sharpe is better too.
It does not make sense.
I'm also not sure about selecting the 2 starting props based on the fact they can both play both sides. By all means have a versatile one on the bench, or one starting, but our current best THP and LHP should in principle start.