Given that the Lions will be putting a lot of bombs up to our fullback, surely it makes sense to put izzy back there
He should be in the 22, and Deans should wait to see how the game unfolds, before putting him on
the trouble with your theory is that it implies deans is proactive with his subs. That he notes how the game is going and makes tactical substitutions.
For mine one of his most frustrating habits is the lack of subbing when the game clearly requires it.
Izzy is great under the high ball but will be able to deal with what happens after he catches it?
An average Wales side? You mean the Wales side that came within a bees dick of beating France and playing in the RWC final? The Wales side that then went on to win the six nations?
.
Only if he has signed for next season, if he hasn't then nup, he can play for Uni during the break.
I don't want to see a unit become a Wob after so few games and then turning out for the Bulldogs next year over someone with runs on the board or a rookie with a future.
People on this site that are pitching Izzy as some straight-outa-college rookie are horribly misguided.
To play devil's advocate here, should Digby not be considered available to play next year? After all he's leaving Australian rugby.
I do on the other hand personally agree with you as all I can see is Tahu donning the gold jersey.
He has not played a single minute of Test match rugby, even against one of the minnows.
Yes, but the point is that he is not a rookie in the way that someone like Mogg is. No selection is foolproof, but in terms of him offering proof that he can handle pressure I think his State of Origin experience is totally relevant. Or maybe I'm just misguided.In rugby terms, especially Test match rugby terms, that is exactly what he is.
He has played a few games of rugby. He has not played a single minute of Test match rugby, even against one of the minnows. We are talking about throwing him straight into a once in 12 years event, in a position the technicalities of which he is still learning.
He has done very well so far (and I have consistently acknowledged that he is a brilliant footballer, who deserves to be selected, whether or not he commits for the long term) but he is still a rookie when it comes to the task facing him if he starts his first rugby test against a Lions team.
Anybody who thinks otherwise is misguided.
Mogg is more of an unknown. I have a grave concerns that he'll simply become invisible at test level. That's certainly what happened in the Crusaders game last fortnight.