My comment about JOC (James O'Connor) being the ideal bench candidate is about that fact that he is the ultimate utility back. I agree with
barbarian in that he is that fucking good but in what position? It's not good enough to be an amazing footballer at Test level. You have to be an amazing <insert position here>.
Look at the benchmark in world rugby, the AB's. They generally select players that are specialists in their positions. Carter 10, Dagg 15, Smith 13, Jane, Savea, Gear 11/14 etc.
Yes JOC (James O'Connor) is amazingly talented, but what's his position? Just reading the above posts we have had calls in the last hour for him to play 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 AND 15!!!
He has never played 9. He's not even the best 10 in his S15 team. 11/14 yes he would be up there in these positions, 13 he's relatively untested and 15 as I mentioned, he could possibly make this position his own. We need to get away from picking the best 7 backs and then putting them into positions and start developing specialists. I think this is
No.8 s point.
You would never hear anyone say it's a good idea to pick Cruden at 10 and then just cause he's so good, lets put Carter in at 15 or 12 or wherever. They're both 10's, pick the best one and the other one misses out.