mark_s
Chilla Wilson (44)
I am not excusing the loss, quite the opposite in fact. It's Deans job to put 15 players on the field with a game plan to win games and Elsom to right the ship once it starts going pear shaped on the field.
The 15 players selected were good enough to beat Samoa but there had to be allowance for the fact there was few combinations, some players out of position and a few players short of a gallop in the 15 (and in the 22 for that matter). For once, I think our game would have been better served by some more box kicks and kicking in general to stop the Samoans charging out of the line and overcommitting into the ruck and to get their big boys to cover more miles. That would have also allowed us to use the speed advantage we had on the wings. The other problem was our forwards played like a group of 8 players rather than as a pack. Too frequently isolated, few offloads, too many hitting the ruck one out with others holding back. ITs a common problem for the men in gold.
The 15 players selected were good enough to beat Samoa but there had to be allowance for the fact there was few combinations, some players out of position and a few players short of a gallop in the 15 (and in the 22 for that matter). For once, I think our game would have been better served by some more box kicks and kicking in general to stop the Samoans charging out of the line and overcommitting into the ruck and to get their big boys to cover more miles. That would have also allowed us to use the speed advantage we had on the wings. The other problem was our forwards played like a group of 8 players rather than as a pack. Too frequently isolated, few offloads, too many hitting the ruck one out with others holding back. ITs a common problem for the men in gold.