KOB1987
John Eales (66)
Must be. That said he didn't have a bad game, there were plenty better though.I'm guessing these things are voted for on social media? Fucking weird. Can think of half a dozen or more who were better.
Must be. That said he didn't have a bad game, there were plenty better though.I'm guessing these things are voted for on social media? Fucking weird. Can think of half a dozen or more who were better.
I'm pretty sure it is the journos and other people in the media box.I'm guessing these things are voted for on social media? Fucking weird. Can think of half a dozen or more who were better.
I'm pretty sure it is the journos and other people in the media box.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Naaaah....his perfect conversion rate easily nullified his kick out on the full, his charged down kick(again) and his total lack of impact/involvement in our scoring attack moves and pedestrian passing all game! Be fairFoley awarded MOTM.... that's going to rile up a few people.
Foley awarded MOTM.... that's going to rile up a few people.
Yeah I'm thinking that Cheika is orchestrating a mobility over brute back row. We lose the collision though, so maybe he counters that with big backs e.g.
Funny he didn't get a mention from the GAGR reviewer.
Well isn't that the funniest coincidence....you were just having a go at me in another thread for continually pointing out Bernard's Foleys, which I again explained was because SOOO many people are blind to it....and look what happens! POINT PROVEN I THINK!I'm guessing these things are voted for on social media? Fucking weird. Can think of half a dozen or more who were better.
Totally agree....I think their mobility showed its potential tonight......it could have been a cricket score with better finishing of some of there impact plays in the first half!We'd all love to see Timani really assert himself at number 8 but right now I reckon McMahon is doing a better job of being more physical and winning collisions than he is.
That was a really good game from him and rivalled his game in Bledisloe 2.
When we were under the pump in the first half I think Hooper and McMahon were really key to our scrambling defence and keeping us in the game.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Well isn't that the funniest coincidence..you were just having a go at me in another thread for continually pointing out Bernard's Foleys, which I again explained was because SOOO many people are blind to it..and look what happens! POINT PROVEN I THINK!
(Did he really get MOTM? I don't believe it...)
Well isn't that the funniest coincidence..you were just having a go at me in another thread for continually pointing out Bernard's Foleys, which I again explained was because SOOO many people are blind to it..and look what happens! POINT PROVEN I THINK!
(Did he really get MOTM? I don't believe it...)
Well isn't that the funniest coincidence..you were just having a go at me in another thread for continually pointing out Bernard's Foleys, which I again explained was because SOOO many people are blind to it..and look what happens! POINT PROVEN I THINK!
(Did he really get MOTM? I don't believe it...)
So If it's all bad, Is that a reflection on ME....or FOLEY! And maybe try looking 3 posts above...I comment plenty on other things......(I find it interesting that the haters never debate what I say about Foleys performances.....rather you show a lack of decency and have a crack at me......you do realize he plays a lot of tests......so if he's playing garbage your going to hear a lot of criticism)Yeah dude, i don't think i've ever seen a post from you about anything other than how bad Foley is. Get over it.
We'd all love to see Timani really assert himself at number 8 but right now I reckon McMahon is doing a better job of being more physical and winning collisions than he is.
That was a really good game from him and rivalled his game in Bledisloe 2.
When we were under the pump in the first half I think Hooper and McMahon were really key to our scrambling defence and keeping us in the game.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I'm not suggesting McMahon missing out. I would put Timani at 8 to lock the scrum with McMahon moving to 6.
Horses for courses maybe. We got away with a lack of muscle in the back row this week unlike against the Boks
Dempsey made 10x the impact in his 15 minutes than Hanigan has the entire season.