He looks pretty big for his height already. Where is that extra 10 kegs going to go? He is young, as are Kaitu’u and Uelese.My guess is that Lonergan is the long term preference/a target for RWC23. He has the skills and he's already been exposed to a high level of football and looked ok. A year or two bulking and he will be the goods - right in time for the world cup.
Everyone else is auditioning to be one of the other two hookers in a world cup squad IMO.
This for me.If McInerney, or any one of the others, shows consistency in throwing to the lineout I reckon he or the other will move rapidly up the pecking order.
He was dismissed quickly and quietly after a good performance in the last Bled game. Might have been something happen in camp? He was throwing well along with his scrummaging. He was starting to look fit as FF (Folau Fainga'a) is now. At 24 he is still very young and has time.Leaving Uelese at home is most surprising to me.
Me too. But i do like rennie "underperform or your out" mentality to selection. Wilson is another example of a guy they clearly see value in but hasnt really performed to his abilities this test season. Im sure the like of uelese and wilson have been told they needs to do more when they gets their next crack at the jersey. Im sure we'll see both back in the fold next year if they play wellLeaving Uelese at home is most surprising to me.
It was evident during Super Rugby TT that Lonergan was far more dynamic around the field than the other domestic hooker options............ his ball running, and ability to bend the defensive line was particularly impressive.
He's a very exciting future prospect, but it goes without saying that he needs to bulk up if he wants to compete at test level, and not get his head pushed out his arse in the scrum.
Heftiness comes before speediness. But both are essential these days for a 2. As well as being a great scrummager, a peerless thrower, and a superb general of the rolling maul.Billy Pollard has the potential to be even more significant around the field - but I think is even smaller. He probably needs to relocate though, being stuck behind three Wallaby hookers
simple isn't it?Heftiness comes before speediness. But both are essential these days for a 2. As well as being a great scrummager, a peerless thrower, and a superb general of the rolling maul.
I'm sure hookers would say it is. Maybe they would be right.Is Hooker the most technically challenging position?
depends how much your paying.Is Hooker the most technically challenging position?
Is Hooker the most technically challenging position?
My guess is that Lonergan is the long term preference/a target for RWC23. He has the skills and he's already been exposed to a high level of football and looked ok. A year or two bulking and he will be the goods - right in time for the world cup.
Everyone else is auditioning to be one of the other two hookers in a world cup squad IMO.
Is Hooker the most technically challenging position?
I assume its one of the front-row just by virtue of the fact that they aren't needed to attack or receive the lineout.Why are the Hookers the ones who throw in the line-out?
I don't believe its in the rule book it must be the Hooker, here's an idea, choose the best around the park and scrum and let some-one else throw it in the line-out.
If they are going to benchmark Mcinerney‘s throwing against Japan, v the others against NZ, SAF, ARG and FRA, then he’s getting a free ride.This for me.
Every one of the hookers on the list has struggled with their throwing to an unacceptable degree. If one of them gets it right they’ll be my first choice.
I don’t really see the value in Latu that others do - or maybe more specifically I think he is too hot and cold. But if he can replicate his World Cup form then he’ll be clearly the best of the current options.
I think they did the right thing leaving Lonergan behind - but definitely looks promising for the future.
It doesn’t have to be, but it’s now a core role of the hooker, especially at the elite level. Club teams regularly use flankers and props, and a long time ago it used to be a winger, even in internationals.Why are the Hookers the ones who throw in the line-out?
I don't believe its in the rule book it must be the Hooker, here's an idea, choose the best around the park and scrum and let some-one else throw it in the line-out.
Depends how good your props are.Is Hooker the most technically challenging position?