Fixed. Hate you to miss blaming someone.
I get the parochial fervour and 'amusing' homespun blog editing, but surely you aren't serious on any level where facts matter.
Why do we think we have a situation where the Brumbies, Reds, etc home crowds are now at disastrous levels? Who precisely has made it that way? Will it be corrected with one home victory?
You seem to think that one weekend's possible victory over the Sunwolves is really far more important right now than any other identifiable dimension of code health in Australia as exists in June 2018.
The facts - commercial and otherwise - point in an entirely different direction.
We have a situation of booked attendances at Ireland vs Australia, 42,000 sell-out Sydney, near sell-out Melbourne 29,000+, and likely 42,000 + Brisbane? Let's say 113,000 times a (conservative) net per seat gross yield of $70 = $7,910,000. Not too bad for 3 matches. Red and Brums might each get for one Super game in 2018, say 8,000 seats times a gross yield of $25 = $200,000 X 3 matches = $600,000 (the real net take-home $s for these Super sides will be way less than this as these crowd levels start to get dangerously near only a gross $ profit break-even point in relation to stadium hire and stadium running costs per game.)
There will be a great atmosphere at these Test events - in many ways they are the last bastions of pro rugby in this country, the last breaths of life and a pulse that affirms it.
The reason is that, in Australian pro rugby, the _only_ thing holding together with some semblance of solidity is (a) Australian's love of our national teams in most sports (and League and AFL don't have them, well, in the former case, not really) and (b) Australian rugby fans are smart enough to know that Ireland's 2018 version is up for a great contest.
Even more critically, the only serious profit making machine yielding +ve cash flow
to the whole code we have in Australian rugby is the Wallabies - it is a simple and also crucial fact that if fan, viewership and sponsorship collapses for the Wallabies, that collapse will take Australian pro rugby and all its funding for the amateur branch down with it, fully and finally.
Wallaby commercial viability though is at risk: annual total Wallaby crowds are falling and if there is a repeat vs Ireland of the humiliation vs England 2016, and when combined with Bled Cup barrenness for over a decade, there are good grounds to suspect that we will see a tipping point where fan and sponsor support for the Wallaby brand could head irrevocably downwards to profitless levels thus threatening the entire code's viability.
Thus, every fact and sensible argument points to the conclusion that State and Terriritory RU's should -
in their own strategic interests no less - support the delivery of the very best possible Wallaby team, not only in its make up, but equally in its pre-game preparedness, to win as many Tests as possible.
That the Brumbies coaches and management, on little but short-term parochial grounds, did not appear to share this analysis and grasp of priority only points to the type of poor judgement and lack of business viability common sense that may in part be responsible for the truly parlous state they find their team, their coaches and its support crowds to be in.