I certainly wouldn't pick him in the matchday 23 right now (and Mowen certainly deserves to be selected ahead of him) but the reality is the form gap has closed and comments about his 2012 tests don't really stack up in my opinion as Higgers has played more tests and struggled to dominate as well.
I, for one, am glad you've brought this to our attention. I was under the impression that Deans did know what was going on, but now I realise that he clearly doesn't. Where's that ARU Facebook page? I can feel another angry letter coming on.It is ridiculous that Phipps has been picked over White. Deans clearly has no idea on what is going on..
You'll need fibre before then. Not good to hold on too long.I'll save losing my shit until he selects Burgess on Monday...
Saying they treat incumbency the way Deans has the past 18mo-2yr is reimagining history.
Yeah, if it happens the Burgess and Beale inclusions will be farcical.
looks very possible with Burgess being forced into the Rebels squad this weekm maybe people were right saying Deans' selection of Phibbs was a way to get Burgess back into Australia?I'll save losing my shit until he selects Burgess on Monday...
It is ridiculous that Phipps has been picked over White. Deans clearly has no idea on what is going on..
lindommer, "tits for hands" classic.
I don't really get the criticism of Deans in potentially selecting players like Beale and Burgess.
I think Beale will definitely be selected but I'm not sure about Burgess yet.
If the coach thinks they are amongst the players he wants in his team and they are available for selection then he should pick them. It isn't the coaches responsibility to decide who deserves and who doesn't deserve selection.
It is the ARU's responsibility to determine if these players are available for selection. If they don't want Burgess selected above a regular Super Rugby player then they should change their policy.
If they don't want Beale selected because of his indiscretions then they should suspend him.
I don't think the coach should ever be in the position of having to make moral judgements with their selections.
But he shouldn't be selecting someone like Burgess on the mere basis that he's available...
What about on the basis that he may provide a style of 9 play he wants to utilise?
Passes that go behind a player are not generally a style of play most teams want to utilise, but I guess Deans is two steps ahead of the rest of us...