Sure is a fine line!You would think that Deans white anting the Reds would have him censured, but the ARU doesn't seem to care about that too much!
But if we want comment and opinions from coaches, we won't like it all, it is a brave new world
Sure is a fine line!You would think that Deans white anting the Reds would have him censured, but the ARU doesn't seem to care about that too much!
George Smith had more impact at the breakdown than Hooper.....
yeah but in how many minutes?compared to Smith's 14m.
his d is definitely better. no doubt, but he still is not good enough in contact. i think that would be hard for you to argue. especially when you compare him to other international fly halfs.
what are your thoughts that he has perhaps over compensated? whether this is a result of the criticism he received or also because he is lacking a bit of confidence pose knee op. it seems to me like he's a bit concerned to undertake the big jinking runs and is also underplaying his hand, a bit too much.
would be interested to know others thoughts on that, as having watched the reds' last 4 games, it is something i have picked up on.
Defense - I think it is now equivalent to a Larkham
THIS is the openside breakaway's bread and butter. Backrowers scoring tries is the cream and jam.
yeah but in how many minutes?
You'd hope that Pulver caught up with Deans at the Beuna Vista last night and told him that its not really on to criticise the form of unpicked by players in public by reference to, and blaming the form of, other unpicked players.You would think that Deans white anting the Reds would have him censured, but the ARU doesn't seem to care about that too much!
Lost me right there. Can't take you seriously when you make comments like that.
I'm losing my marbles - i thought Smith went off just before half time: at least the games seem to be lasting longer, I guess. Edit: actually, i think that means the games are going quicker.Hooper played 80, Smith played 60.
I'm losing my marbles - i thought Smith went off just before half time: at least the games seem to be lasting longer, I guess. Edit: actually, i think that means the games are going quicker.
He misses more tackles due to his positioning before contact than anything IMO.Funny you mention that - watching Wilkinson versus Larkham last night in the 2001 Lions 2nd Test was instructive.
What I've noticed is that Quade doesn't want to get his head low, particularly front-on. Hip height tackles are just not really part of his instinctive play in the line, and neither is driving low into contact when he has the ball. His cover and chase tackling don't show the same symptoms.
Is there some incident as a kid that put him off?
You would think that Deans white anting the Reds would have him censured, but the ARU doesn't seem to care about that too much!
I think you are forgetting how many games Larkham played with one arm and struggled to make tackles.
He misses more tackles due to his positioning before contact than anything IMO.
The one last week against the 9 being a good example.Had he tracked on a flatter line, he would have removed the step inside as an option for the 9. And he would not have needed to hit the brakes at all.
He's not the only one, KB (Kurtley Beale) does not position the ball carrier where he wants him to be at contact either.
Sure they'll be more lineouts than scrums, but the latter will be a significant source of penalties. The only penalties coming form the lineout will be from a resulting maul and in that respect it is also important to have big bodies to defend a rolling maul, as well as jumpers. For the same reason he is good in the scrum, Timani's big frame helps stop the initial momentum of a rolling maul. That's handy particularly in 2013 where the referees give teams less time to use it or lose it.
I'm not sold on the idea of having Palu and Timani on the field at the same time, because I agree we need 3 genuine lineout jumpers. We might be better off having one start from the bench.
We have a significant advantage over the BILs in the 7 position, they don't have a scavenger up to the class of Smith, Gill or Hooper. Hooper's not quite as good as the other two when his team don't have the ball; I think it's imperative we start with Gill and run Hooper on later in the game. A couple of turnovers at the tackle will surely take the wind out of the BILs' sails, we've got to create this sort of damage early in the game. We'll be lucky to get parity at the set pieces, we simply have to attack the breakdown like hungry dogs.
Like most internet pundits, Hitler hasn't watched the last few rounds of Super Rugby.