whitefalcon
Ron Walden (29)
Or guys not reporting injuries/niggles?Surely it can't be as simple as blokes putting in too many overs?
Or guys not reporting injuries/niggles?Surely it can't be as simple as blokes putting in too many overs?
Is that even a bad thing?I wouldn't be surprised if selections are open slather on overseas players in the lead up and after RWC23
Swap Rodda for Philip IMO.BR I reckon part of the issue is the communication, Rugby Australia rightly couldn't commit to Arnold because he might not have made the 3 but if everyone knows they're part of the plan Arnold might prepare himself better for the Tests?
I still think Arnold is in our best 3 locks. Skelton, Arnold, Frost and then Rodda are 4 high quality locks.
The trick is to play NZ less.Is that even a bad thing?
As it stands, our Super franchises salary structure pays the vast majority to a few key players per team and then the rest of the squad is on peanuts, not even including our Wallaby top ups. They then lock down positions in our squads that developing players realistically have zero chance of breaking into.
We always lament the fact that players on the fringe of selection to overseas - Eg Mack Hansen - but realistically, why wouldn’t they?
If the bill for our first XV is footed by international teams, there are so many more opportunities for talent retention here.
Super Rugby AU showed a real desire for a domestic product. I don’t think a few key Wallabies going overseas would change that.
Sure - we’d be less competitive against NZ, but who cares? We’d go from losing by 20 to losing by 40. What’s the difference?
Just on this, it's no surprise Skelton looked a lot better this time when he knew probably months out he was going to be selected on the EOYT rather than last year he probably only found out a couple weeks before. Not just physically too, I'm sure he was part of various WhatsApp groups and meetings virtually too leading up.BR I reckon part of the issue is the communication, Rugby Australia rightly couldn't commit to Arnold because he might not have made the 3 but if everyone knows they're part of the plan Arnold might prepare himself better for the Tests?
I still think Arnold is in our best 3 locks. Skelton, Arnold, Frost and then Rodda are 4 high quality locks.
I see Frost as a very similar lock to Arnold, with Frost having more upside. I would not have picked Skelton a month ago, but he has impressed me with his off the bench contributions. The four locks I would be taking to the WC would be Frost, Phillip, Skelton and either Neville or Rodda, throw in Swain and that gives six very good locks.Just on this, it's no surprise Skelton looked a lot better this time when he knew probably months out he was going to be selected on the EOYT rather than last year he probably only found out a couple weeks before. Not just physically too, I'm sure he was part of various WhatsApp groups and meetings virtually too leading up.
Is it 5 tests next year before the RWC? I hope the players are made available for every test as prep.
Opening the floodgates for selection could be a disaster. I'd imagine most of the current wallabies squad would look to head os to maximise their earnings if they could still be selected for the national team.Is that even a bad thing?
As it stands, our Super franchises salary structure pays the vast majority to a few key players per team and then the rest of the squad is on peanuts, not even including our Wallaby top ups. They then lock down positions in our squads that developing players realistically have zero chance of breaking into.
We always lament the fact that players on the fringe of selection to overseas - Eg Mack Hansen - but realistically, why wouldn’t they?
If the bill for our first XV is footed by international teams, there are so many more opportunities for talent retention here.
Super Rugby AU showed a real desire for a domestic product. I don’t think a few key Wallabies going overseas would change that.
Sure - we’d be less competitive against NZ, but who cares? We’d go from losing by 20 to losing by 40. What’s the difference?
So, that's 2 home games for the All Blacks then.AB's at the mcg & EP
Did I say it was a bad thing? It’s inevitable unless the structure changes at the elite level.Is that even a bad thing?
As it stands, our Super franchises salary structure pays the vast majority to a few key players per team and then the rest of the squad is on peanuts, not even including our Wallaby top ups. They then lock down positions in our squads that developing players realistically have zero chance of breaking into.
We always lament the fact that players on the fringe of selection to overseas - Eg Mack Hansen - but realistically, why wouldn’t they?
If the bill for our first XV is footed by international teams, there are so many more opportunities for talent retention here.
Super Rugby AU showed a real desire for a domestic product. I don’t think a few key Wallabies going overseas would change that.
Sure - we’d be less competitive against NZ, but who cares? We’d go from losing by 20 to losing by 40. What’s the difference?
If he Waratahs play him there. Maybe.Gees Marky Mark (Nawaqanitawase) (Nawaqanitawase) has all the makings of a potentially great fullback…….
Not sure about that, his strengths seem to be in the wing position, leave him there.
I’d say Tom Banks had the makings of a very good test winger, but was pushed to fullback where he is good at Super Rugby level, but average at test level.
Didn’t say ‘great winger’Nah he was never elusive enough to be a great winger.
Agreed with Skelton, he was immense in the time he was given this tour.I prefer Bell over Slipper.
I think Skelton confirmed he's in the 23. Probably on the bench.