qwerty51
Stirling Mortlock (74)
NZRU undercut RA. All Blacks XV playing two matches in Japan. Aussie A would've been very handy this yearIt's the year to have a Wallabies v Aussie A game before the international window.
NZRU undercut RA. All Blacks XV playing two matches in Japan. Aussie A would've been very handy this yearIt's the year to have a Wallabies v Aussie A game before the international window.
Seems stupid.NZRU undercut Rugby Australia. All Blacks XV playing two matches in Japan. Aussie A would've been very handy this year
This is where the shitslinging from McLennan around Super's viability really did us no favours. By no means am I suggesting we should bow to every demand, but it would be wise to keep an amicable relationship with our closest rugby partner. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer, etc.Seems stupid.
All 3 teams could have played in a mini round robin tournament hosted in Japan, rather than playing the same team twice.
This is where the shitslinging from McLennan around Super's viability really did us no favours. By no means am I suggesting we should bow to every demand, but it would be wise to keep an amicable relationship with our closest rugby partner. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer, etc.
I think he is just playing good footy and keen to see how he goes against us tomorrow. Wallabies are in need of a high quality winger to match Koro. There are a few good wingers around atm but he has something special and it is speed, size and skill.He's playing some of his best footy right now at 15.
Then doing something brain-dead and ruining everything.It probably is depending on how you play your fullback...
One of Tom Wright's strengths, both on the spring tour and with the Brumbies, is acting as an extra playmaker and setting up his wingers.
Not convinced about the Dave Rennie opinion but we will find out. Think you are right about Eddie picking his strongest team and then doing minor changes to that group upto the RWC. If a player doesn't make that first cut their chances diminish dramatically subject to injury or course.With 4 tests only available before the squad is selected/announced, is there a real opportunity for Eddie to run a proper trial there for the three players? Does he give them a full test each and only then has the fourth test to see his team on the field? Is that fair on the player up against the ABs compared to the one against the Argies? Does he give them half a game each? Is that fair on the one(s) playing the first half and would the one playing the second half have an advantage?
I reckon Eddie hasn't got the time to be doing trials like that. IMO he will have to at least reduce the options to 2 where he might run one against the Argies and ABs, and the other against the Saffas and ABs. But in all likelihood, he will need to have made his mind up before the first test as to what his best XV and XXIII are and be using the few tests available to be bedding those players into their roles. In the long run, I reckon his XV and XXIII will look essentially the same as they would have been had Dave Rennie been retained until the Cup.
I find the Eddie vs Izzy reporting on this a bit of a beat up. As far as I'm aware Eddie has never coached Folau, he wasn't involved with RA at the same time and Folau is ineligible for the Wallabies so it's not likely there.is some history there. It's really just an attempt to cash in on controversy clicks Folau name brings.There is really a right place to post this but it's partially relevant to Wallabies 2023 so here will do - Koroibete is in a World XV playing against the BaaBaas at Twickenham on May 26th. The BaaBaas are being coached by Eddie. The inclusion of another ex-Wallabies winger in the World XV is interesting also, especially as it's coached (and presumably selected) by Steve Hansen.
So you continue to say. Some examples if you will? And the no arms tackle and ball throw against the Canes don't count because they were not picked up and had no detrimental affect on the game.Then doing something brain-dead and ruining everything.
That’s not how it works..So you continue to say. Some examples if you will? And the no arms tackle and ball throw against the Canes don't count because they were not picked up and had no detrimental affect on the game.
I'm a bit lost - what has Swinton got to do with Wright?That’s not how it works..
Swinton did nothing wrong, it had no detrimental effect on that game.
I'm a bit lost - what has Swinton got to do with Wright?
Ah. OK, I see.BR's proposition, above, is that in the Hurricanes game Tom Wright wasn't penalised for the no arms tackle on the hooker or for throwing the ball away when tackled into touch. As a result they no influence on the game and so we shouldn't be concerned by it. Qwerty51 is merely saying that Swinton wasn't penalised for his tackle in the Force game, so it had no influence on it and as an extension of the proposition from BR, we should be ok with him doing it again.
The things you get away with are the concern because you don't learn from it. You'll do it again and you will get caught next time.
Is he signed for next season? Could probably use that cap on someone a little more reliable. Wallabies and Tahs.Ah. OK, I see.
Although Swinton got 7 weeks so I'd rather he didn't do it again, if and when he plays.
I don't know, probably. Could be a really good player if he could reign in the stupidity. But he really does not seem to have the intent to do that - the indiscretions are disturbingly repetitive in their nature. Liability.Is he signed for next season? Could probably use that cap on someone a little more reliable. Wallabies and Tahs.