The_Brown_Hornet
John Eales (66)
I've not kept up with JOC (James O'Connor) happenings since he left OZ. What position has he been mostly playing and how's he gone up North? Is he still any good?
Yeah he will likely be in the squad. Philip will not be.Best squad I've seen yet. Pretty clear that fans generally have now discarded Adam Coleman. On form, there's no argument, but on experience, surely he will be considered along the same lines as the Beale supporters point to his 580 odd tests when he is not the form No 15 in the Aussie conference.
Best squad I've seen yet. Pretty clear that fans generally have now discarded Adam Coleman. On form, there's no argument, but on experience, surely he will be considered along the same lines as the Beale supporters point to his 580 odd tests when he is not the form No 15 in the Aussie conference.
I do like you hanging onto the premise that Beale had a bad season.
I agree that Banks was more consistent. I don't think that is going to get him the starting jersey though.
On form Beale shouldn't be anywhere near the starting Wobs team, but I expect him to be persevered with initially
As a 15 at test level, he isn't safe enough under the high ball and struggles to get go forward against a set chase line.
But I don't think Banks will start at 15, DHP deserves the role
You talk about form and suggest that Beale shouldn't be anywhere near the team but then conclude saying DHP deserves the role.
I think DHP had a pretty average season for the Rebels. On purely Super Rugby form he'd be third behind Banks and Beale.
His much more Physical then Mogg, and breaks tackles with power more then just speed. Mogg did have some brilliance at test and some not so good moments, but wasn't really given a chance, plus Banks tackling is a strength were Moggs was an issue.I've said it before, so forgive me for repeating myself. I want to see Banks given a shot at some point, but I fear he's Jesse Mogg 2.0 - good at Super level, but his physical deficiencies may prove too great to thrive at test level.
We haven't seen enough to confirm that assessment though, and I'd love him to prove me wrong.
I think a few players are primed to start their Wallaby careers in ernest next year: Petaia, Valetini, Philip maybe McDermott, Gordon
I do like you hanging onto the premise that Beale had a bad season.
I agree that Banks was more consistent. I don't think that is going to get him the starting jersey though.
I readily concede your argument BH, but Banks has put in a very impressive last half of the season, and as someone here keeps telling us in the early parts of the season, that early season form means little and other players will rise to the top towards the end, then he is more deserving of the Wallabies No 15 spot than Beale.
Does Keiran Reid even play Super Rugby anymore?I agree with all that. I just think Cheika will go with Beale. He'll want the second playmaker ability that Beale brings from fullback and he'll back his test experience to deliver the best outcome.
I could be entirely wrong but that's my prediction.
Likewise, Cheika could be wrong, but it's largely his decision. I highly doubt Johnson and O'Connor will be demanding that certain selection decisions are non negotiable.
There wouldn't be a test coach anywhere in the world who picks their squad and team entirely on form.
With the expectation that a 33 player Wallaby squad will be named tomorrow I thought it would be interesting to compare to what happened last time.
In 2015 Cheika named a 40 player squad for the Rugby Championship. The schedule was a bit different in that we first played South Africa at home before travelling to Argentina. The two All Blacks games were at the end as they are this time. The longer camp at home meant a larger squad made sense.
Did you just compare Kurtley Beale to Keiran Reid ?Does Keiran Reid even play Super Rugby anymore?
Did you just compare Kurtley Beale to Keiran Reid ?