Surprised Slipper has made it back this week after his head knock last week.Hope he is really good to go.
What's the news on Allan Ala'alatoa's injury? After being the iron man of Super Rugby all year, apparently one or two training sessions with Cheika is enough to put him out for a period. I am starting to wonder if we will see him again this year or if he has done a Poey.
I probably would have preferred to see Jones start this match (if not Valetini) for comparison with LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto).
I am sorry to see Nic White back on the bench. He had one of the stronger games against the Saffas and the more time he gets with the team the better. It would have been an ideal opportunity to see the new combination of White/Lealiifano in operation too. We all know what Will Genia brings and unfortunately it's not anywhere near his best in recent times.
Reese Hodge must be Cheika's new white haired boy. His form doesn't warrant his inclusion at the expense of Tom Banks who again was a strong performer against the Saffas.
All in all, the forwards pack is starting to look like it's locked in. Still some confusing and worrying selection in the backs.
Weren't you one of the loudest calling for a selection panel? But now that we have one everything is still Cheika's doing. Someone might correct me, but it's my understanding that if there is disagreement about a selection Johnson has the casting vote? I'd actually say that the re-selection of LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) smells more of Johnson than it does of Cheika, like you I would have liked to have seen someone else given the start.
I don't have any issues with the content of this post and agree with most of it, except for the snipe about AAA above. I don't think an abductor injury to a front rower who has had a pretty tough year would be all that out of the ordinary. They were expecting him to be right this weekend but being a WC year I'd say they want to make sure our #1 THP is 100%.
I also didn't have any issues with the content of the Hooper/Wright post, in many ways you are right there. The point was that if you are going to have a whinge every time Hooper gets selected it's going to be a long year for you..and us!
In the modern game the back row is all about balance. Hooper is MVP almost every time he steps out, it doesn't matter that he isn't fulfilling all the roles of a traditional #7, he is doing a lot of the work a 6 or 8 would normally do, the challenge for the selectors is to find a player who fills that void, in this case a fetcher/pilferer. I can understand the logic in playing Hooper and Pocock together, they are/were our 2 best players and complemented each other very well, the problem is they were both short and with the lack of a proper ball running 8 or 6 that project always had a finite timeline.
Re the Banks/Hodge one, we are all a bit confused about that. However, it's no secret that the undecided starting spots are 6 (we thought), 9, 10, 14 and 15. So perhaps it's just a bit of further experimentation. Maybe Banks has already booked his spot so they're trying to work out the final outside back squad spots. Point is, I don't think we need to read too much into some of the selections at this stage.