boyo
Mark Ella (57)
I think Naivalu would give Morahan a run for his money.
I see what you did there
I think Naivalu would give Morahan a run for his money.
99% of lineout takes go to the man it's called to. It's a meaningless measurement. Losses and steals on the other hand.
When you boil it down though, the differences are very small. Let's say you average 10 line out throws of your own each match then the difference from having one of the best lineouts in the comp and one of the worst is probably one lost throw extra each match.
That is not insignificant.
Rather than 1 every game it's probably most games - no difference and then in one game - lose 4 extra.When you boil it down though, the differences are very small. Let's say you average 10 line out throws of your own each match then the difference from having one of the best lineouts in the comp and one of the worst is probably one lost throw extra each match.
If you look at lineout success, the 8 teams currently sitting in finals spots are ranked:
1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 13, 16, 17.
The difference between 1 and 17 is only 10% of total lineout success.
That's not much correlation between lineout success and team success.
If you looked at offloads for example, the 8 teams in finals spots are ranked:
1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 12.
The gap in numbers here is substantially larger and there's a whole lot greater correlation with competition ranking.
Rather than 1 every game it's probably most games - no difference and then in one game - lose 4 extra.
Makes a big difference if you're, say, in a semi final..
RWC GF the Wallabies lost up to 4 line outs..
Winning the lineout might give you the greatest net yardage off the next play, and thus be the most important attacking platform, but losing the battle of the scrum or breakdown can cost you the game, even if you're the better team in every other way. This is especially so when we face England, who often beat us, and when they do, they do so by dominating one of those two aspects of the game.
In isolation maybe, but when correlated with other statistics like line out success it becomes a more relevant measure of a players line-out ability..
Line-out success:
Reds: 91.6%(2nd in Super Rugby)
Rebels: 87.9%(7th)
Brumbies: 87.7%(9th)
Force: 83.8%(15th)
Tahs: 83.5%(16th)
Rather than 1 every game it's probably most games - no difference and then in one game - lose 4 extra.
Makes a big difference if you're, say, in a semi final..
You're example is a classic case of why the first five minutes of any introductory stat class is always 'correlation does not equal causation'.