Gnostic
Mark Ella (57)
Hooper is a very good rugby player - no question.
From tidbits I have gleaned over the years from pretty good yet nameless sources (including the Tahs) Hooper is not overly respected by his peers, not as a rugby player but as a bloke. There has been plenty of stuff said that Hooper is an individual and not a team man and plays as such. IMO there are also another few players in the group who could easily be categorised similarly. The impression which is reality is that Hooper never seems to take responsibility and always seemed prepared to deflect negatives away from himself. He obviously has been a Cheika teflon player, certainly evidenced by Chek by not picking the best 7 available so many times. The Pooper worked well at the RWC but not so much since. Hooper always maintained the 7 spot and the bloke who is not an 8, played 8.
Players are not stupid. Players pick up on the nuances. To be off a per cent or 2 or 3 changes the results of team sports.
A mate of mine who played with Eales said he was a very good rugby player (not great in the true sense of the word) but was a superb leader and captain, so much respected by his peers both on the field and off. That "culture" or inclusiveness by the whole group made a huge difference.
I genuinely wish Hooper to be a successful captain and leader but I fear that may not be the case. We shall see..
I also wonder about the history and the involvement of some Tahs players in the Link/Patston fiasco and how that taint still remains and perhaps even gets stronger with the return of Beale.
With culture problems having some players basically never accountable truly ingrains the entitled attitude and performance will be effected.