mudskipper
Colin Windon (37)
keep an eye on a call up for Jordan Smiler No.8 Brumbies
keep an eye on a call up for Jordan Smiler No.8 Brumbies
Nah... he's a serviceable player at Super Rugby level, but I don't see him having a guaranteed position in the Brumbies 23 going forward.
Here would be my stab at it. I have not gone solely on form but have opted for some Wallabies over complete green-horns.
1. Slipper
2. Latu
3. Kepu
4. Arnold
5. Coleman (Skelton excellent in his one game, Rodda has been very good, Carter decent).
6. Fardy
7. Hooper
8. Timani (Higginbotham decent)
9. Powell
10. Lance
11. DHP
12. Kerevi (best guy playing 12 has probably been Meakes)
13. Kuridrani
14. Folau (for someone playing wing, maybe Peni or Robinson)
15. Hunt
Current Wallabies well down on form: Robertson, Moore, Simmons, Douglas, Mumm, Phipps
Cyprus are not an official union registered with World Rugby. You won't find them on the world rankings. This means they did not have to comply with WR (World Rugby) eligibility rules, ands its suggested many players who contributed to their winning streak were South Afrikan.Only if you believe that Cyprus should be excluded from the world record for some reason. Elsewise they still have to reach 25 -- or thereabouts -- to take the record.
EDIT: And that would entail having to win matches in Argentina with what is likely to be a very Lions-depleted squad.
I have previously posted a link on here showing world rugby acknowledging them as having the longest streak. I can't find it online now which is interesting.Cyprus are not an official union registered with World Rugby. You won't find them on the world rankings. This means they did not have to comply with WR (World Rugby) eligibility rules, ands its suggested many players who contributed to their winning streak were South Afrikan.
Sent from my FairPhone
McMahon not showing much at the moment is he? I would have one George Smith in the mix ahead of him on current form.
Only 3 rounds into the comp, with only 5 teams to follow, and someone on an Australian Rugby Fan site doesn't know that a regular Wallaby hasn't played yet, making silly claims as a consequence.McMahon is yet to play this year due to his ankle injury.
Rebels3 - you clearly have a better perspective on Rebels' players than I do, but why Timani at 6 and McMahon at 8. Why not the other way round?
I am also continually surprised when posters who have such a strong attachment to and understanding of the game mix up the side of the scrum that certain props play. Slipper is a LH prop and Allan a is at present a THP. Their numbers would be Slipper at 17 and AA at 18.
You also have Peni in the starting side and also potentially on the bench. I'd agree atm to the starting selection, but by June I think he will be more likely a bench consideration as others with more experience and time in the game come into form.
I'd also have Kuridrani at 13 over Folau, but I very much like Kerevi at 12.
There must be a real risk that Foley needs a significant time out of the game to recover from the concussion symptoms
www.rugby.com.au/news/2017/03/28/00/09/bernard-foley-concussion-round-six
So where does that leave us at 10? Can you risk QC (Quade Cooper) with his predilection for dangerous tackles or getting injured? Are we really going to have Jono Lance? What are the other options?
Its alright with the Stats posted on the Front page none of the Super sides need a 10 anyway and with one of the worst performing sides in terms of attack being "coached" by Larkham the Wallabies won't need one either. Just stick anyone there. I reckon Beale will be 10 without playing a game in Australia this year.
If Foley is unavailable Beale will be Wobs 10 for sure.