Shouldn't that be based purely on what's best for the Wallabies?I care that he may be fast tracked into the Wallabies when he's just here for the money.
I disagree, the Wobs are very lacking in decent quick wingers who score tries will win one on ones
Fair enough. So in your learned opinion our front rows, locks, back rowers, halves and centres are all good enough. If they are, fine, spend a lot of money on a finisher. But if they are not, what sort of ball will the finisher get to score these "one on one" tries?
Maybe he will turn out to be an inspired choice. But he will have to spend a bloody lot of time off his wing looking for the ball. And he does not look big enough for that role.
Shouldn't that be based purely on what's best for the Wallabies?
Sure. I don't think that it would be best for the Wallabies to have a player in there whose heart is not in it 100%.
It's an exaggeration of course but I would rather 15 blokes who may not be World XV players but who have dreamed their whole life of playing for Australia and would bleed for the jersey and the team than a World XV who would rather be somewhere else but are there for the cash.
Don't worry, chaps. We will arrange our own puffs after he joins Camp Wallaby.
Sure. I don't think that it would be best for the Wallabies to have a player in there whose heart is not in it 100%.
It's an exaggeration of course but I would rather 15 blokes who may not be World XV players but who have dreamed their whole life of playing for Australia and would bleed for the jersey and the team than a World XV who would rather be somewhere else but are there for the cash.
Wam it's not just off one comment. He's also come out claiming he was guaranteed a spot on the EOYT, which was then hosed down.
I don't mind him taking money but when he comes out saying that was the only reason behind his decision it makes it seem like he has no interest in playing rugby and playing for the Wallabies.
If he's the best option then select him. But the Wallabies should not be investing time in him if he's not, in order to get him up to scratch, because it sounds like once this deal ends he'll be off again.
If he wants to use rugby, then rugby should use him. Get what you need out of him while he's here then move on like he potentially will.
I don't expect the bloke to come out gushing but he managed to not say a single positive thing about the move. Other than money.
If that's the reality, then the reality is that he really doesn't want to be playing rugby.
I don't expect the bloke to come out gushing but he managed to not say a single positive thing about the move. Other than money.
If that's the reality, then the reality is that he really doesn't want to be playing rugby.
The game is now professional. Give me the best players, I will give you the best team.
Noted. In future I will base my theories on things that he didn't say.As for Koroibete's attitude, why on earth do people continue to base a whole theory on a puff piece written by a loig journalist during their grand final week?
A good number of Top14 squads can put out a best XV at similar levels of quality to Toulon, and that's before you consider teams like Wasps and Saracens.No you won't. This is such a fanciful comment. Toulon buy pretty much whoever they want. They can almost field a World XV team in a domestic competition. How is it that they manage to lose ever?
Noted. In future I will base my theories on things that he didn't say.
A good number of Top14 squads can put out a best XV at similar levels of quality to Toulon, and that's before you consider teams like Wasps and Saracens.
In addition, the war of attrition style a number of, shall we say, less talented squads often manage to drag the players into the 10 man style, where physical fowards, and halves with good kicking games can even up the playing field.
They do regularly lose players that they'd rather retain as well. Both Armitage boys have left for more money, as have Tom Taylor and Freddy Michelak between seasons. Same story with Castrogiovanni, Sanchez and David Smith the season before.