Of course money is a major factor but it's not the only factor as you first inferred. But going back to my original post/s, I don't actually care that he came for the cash, good on him. I care that he may be fast tracked into the Wallabies when he's just here for the money.
But anyway, as usual, this is an argument about things that have possibly been taken out of context and things that may not actually happen.
If that was your interpretation of my comment then so be it, there's quite obviously other factors with influence a players decision, in this case I don't doubt that money was the major one.
There's a well worn parth to Europe for a reason, and it's not purely because players want the opportunity to see other parts of the world, it's because of the money on offer. Rugby union loses so many schoolboys to rugby league because of one thing, money.. one code has the money to offer schoolboys contracts en masse, and the other doesn't.
This isn't a stab at Koroibete, it's more a stab at the context of the article which has painted Koroibete as some sort of villain because he accepted the higher value deal. Who cares if he did, that's the reality of the modern game..
As for those questioning why rugby union valued him above rugby league, well that's a questionable issue as well.. NRL clubs and specifically the storm are shrewd negotiatiors and intelligent long term planners, they know where the value in a team lies. They have long placed an emphasis on retaining the spine of their team(hooker, halves, fullback) and build around that, and Koroibete doesn't tick that box.
Wingers are one of two things in rugby league, young players early on in their career who will inevitably move to the centres/fullback, or a dedicated winger with limited earning potential. Koroibete is a good winger, but unless he intended to move to the centres then he isn't valued very highly in league.. was rugby union right to value him so highly? IMO no he isn't worth that much... but they have him now, so I'm excited to see what he can do