M
Moono75
Guest
I hear the Argies do a good BBQ....well done guys.
Like when the decision to change the Dagg kick was reversed after the review on the Big screen? (Because, you know, that has a much bigger impact on the game than a try..)
Have only seen it once, but he definitely didn't have the ball. Tackled on suspicion you might say, as Savea had lowered his eyes to line the guy up
My disappointment with the not-knock-on was that they saw fit to reverse Dagg's kick after seeing it on the big screen. That's a fucking joke.
Savea got held back earlier, so saying its all a Kiwi plot is bullshit
I actually have a rule not to get into refs, I perhaps am just a little confused with laws of game at times. We have noticed the Savea hold on, the charge down that should of been a try, noone seemed to comment on the player kicking the ball on the ground just after the Savea hold back, or 2 minutes later a kick to touch on full form a ball that was passed back in by a fellow team mate. Also surprised the touchie didn't notice that ball had come off AB when Argoes on attack. Perhaps I just need to stugy laws moreMy disappointment with the not-knock-on was that they saw fit to reverse Dagg's kick after seeing it on the big screen. That's a fucking joke.
Savea got held back earlier, so saying its all a Kiwi plot is bullshit
am I the only one worried that the wallabies will be their first scalp?
the officials made bad calls both ways and the only one that had a quantitative impact on the game was the non-chargedown which was a fucking ridiculous call in favour of the AB's..
conspiracy theories aside, the standard of officiating in this comp has been beyond a joke..when there is no northern hemisphere test rugby occurring right now, how they can allocate the lowest order of refs to the (arguably) strongest international comp in the world is beyond me..
Spot on!Let me first say that the officiating was really poor today. However, just like new players, new referees have to developed and they have to tested at higher and higher levels of the game.
Just like players some bad performances are an indication that they're not good enough to cut it at that level, while others are just an aberration and once the guy finds his feet the performances pick up.
It's then up to the IRB to sort the wheat from the chaff before next year's RWC. There's certainly more work they can do in that regard.
IMO refs etc should only get 4/6N gigs after they've proven themselves at Super Rugby/Aviva/Top14 etc level.