Bullrush
Geoff Shaw (53)
For sure it is a bit of a waste
I guess my problem also stems from, there would be some (as an example) Samoan guys out there who would give their life to pull on that blue jersey, are about to get selected then "nah sorry 103 test player Nonu comes in for 2-3 years to take the spot" what sort of message is that sending to guys who have Samoa as their first choice?
At some point these tier 1 players made a conscious decision to represent that nation, whether it was for love of that country or for financial gain, the tier 2 nation was not their first choice and they shouldn't be able to turn around after either no longer being good enough to make a tier 1 side or raking in the dough and now wanting to represent the country they actually want to.
Would the national team benefit from having these players play for them? Of course! but at what cost? Integrity of the sport, alienating players who have the Tier 2 nations as their first choice, it's also a band-aid solution to a bigger problem.
We need to make playing for these nations more appealing from the get go so when eligible players have to make a decision they don't have to worry so much about money or career development, not bastardizing the eligibility rules for a quick fix. More fixtures for Tier 2 nations, policing of club contracts barring players from playing international footy, assisted funding from World Rugby, policies around gate takings when Tier 1 nations play Tier 2, policies around Tier 2 teams getting home fixtures.
If high profile players want to help out Tier 2 nations, volunteer, become ambassadors, coaches etc represent that way to bring through the next generation who can/want to rep that Tier 2 nation
There would be very few players, if any, who have Samoa as their first choice if they could also play for the All Blacks or Australia, England etc. The reality is that Samoa is already 2nd choice because the money gap is MASSIVE. Not just in terms of getting paid by the ABs or Samoa but how much more a player can expect/demand from clubs when they have played for the All Blacks or a T1 nation. And it is pretty common knowledge that these players are often the main bread winners for a larger extended family and community so the need to make the best money you can is even greater. Samoan players are not alienated because Nonu played for the Manu. If anything, it puts more weight and pride in the jersey.
No integrity is lost whatsoever by the sport simply because any of the players I mentioned earlier represented different countries at different times. And to say the rules are being 'bastardized' when the law itself is less than 20yrs old is a bit rich. The guys at the top of the rugby hierarchy change the laws, some of those lower down the chain say that the law change is adversely affecting them and the reply is 'we shouldn't bastardize the rules!'.
Telling high profile players to help by being anything else except players is like having a mechanic look at your broken down car and telling him to give it good clean inside, change the tyres and wipers but don't work on the engine.
Let them do their work where they best know how to.