Pfitzy
Nathan Sharpe (72)
Spook said:I think his mobility is underrated. Anyway, he can move to number 8 on defensive scrums.
Perhaps. I'd rather just have him and Sharpey pushing at lock. That is some serious motor for the scrum.
Spook said:I think his mobility is underrated. Anyway, he can move to number 8 on defensive scrums.
NTA said:Spook said:I think his mobility is underrated. Anyway, he can move to number 8 on defensive scrums.
Perhaps. I'd rather just have him and Sharpey pushing at lock. That is some serious motor for the scrum.
Scotty said:Gagger said:Would I like bigger guys like Mowen and Higgers to smash guys in tackles and make metres? Yes
Do they? No.
So the choice is between a guy who is doing it at S14 level, and two guys who aren't. Or, you pull Mumm outta lock.
Out of interest, is Michael Jackson your source of special info Scarfie?
PS - Last year I woulda been advocating Mowen on size and performance (before he was injured). But not this.
I agree with your arguement, but I doubt that Hodgson is going to have that effect at international level, so the better option may be to go for one of the bigger guys, with more potential, than the smaller one that has reached his potential. It is now or never in regards to the world cup next year.
You are more or less advocating a return to two opensides, and that was generally a failure at international level.
Gagger said:Definitely not a double openside fan, but the biggest thing Cliffy gives us is go forward, and Hodgson's making more metres per game than Palu or Rocky, or any other Aussie backrower for that matter.
Scotty said:We will lend him to you if you want. Will you take him on a 5 + 5 lease?
Noddy said:my solution.
1 Robinson
2 TPN
3 Weeks
4 Mumm
5 Sharpe
6 Elsom
7 Pocock
8 Benny Alexander!!!!!
I have a ten point argument justifying this selection.
But I'm tired.
Off to bed.
G'night.