This is, again, perplexingly contradictory.
Israel has the right, free from consequence, to publicly state his negative religious position on homosexuals but people are not allowed to comment on his views subsequently?
That doesn't happen in any other scenario. All legal proceedings (save a very select few due to special circumstances, typically where a minor is involved) are open to the public to both witness and comment on.
They were RA employees and should have respected the process.
For any of them to state or infer the situation was untenable for Folau's return to the team was inappropriate.
It seems any negative opinion re Folau was acceptable.
Ugh man, why the hell can't Israel Folau respect the rules then? I suppose i can see the distinction you are trying to draw but im not at all convinced.They were RA employees and should have respected the process.
For any of them to state or infer the situation was untenable for Folau's return to the team was inappropriate.
It seems any negative opinion re Folau was acceptable.
The end of the world is nigh, apparently. Explains everything, if you believe it. Mind you, there are at least half a dozen of these predictions current at any time. Just google.
But we are still here.
Ugh man, why the hell can't Israel Folau respect the rules then? I suppose i can see the distinction you are trying to draw but im not at all convinced.
They were the Wallabies coach and captain and they fronted the media in an official capacity.
Neither of them said his position was untenable.
Didnt the coach say he couldn't select him as it stands.
We are about to get a Labor Government, he may have a point there
Gee I hope Izzy is getting some good advice from somewhere. Reports today that he and his long term manager are estranged.
So far that's the RA head of integrity (Barrister) and a QC (Quade Cooper), and 2xSCs that think the contract was breached and the penalty was appropriate. There's obvious questions about independence there, but that's a fair weight of considered legal opinion.
A legal challenge will be long and expensive. And as it stands, the risk for Folau financially must be pretty huge.
It's alright, he has Alan Jones in his ear....
Sadly, I think it is headed for court and there will be no winners.
And highly likely that Israel will never play in AUS again. He may take the Russian deal, if that is for real. (Buts probably the only place he would get a start in any sport)
Going to cost him and RA lots of money no mater what the eventual outcome is.
Just think RA could have handled it better, taking the hard line to try and get IF to conform was always going to be high risk.
RA should have not signed him up last year, but he promised that he would be good and walk away if there was a problem. They took him at his word and unfortunately he has not kept to this.
His outbursts have an impact on the attractiveness of RA to sponsors (look at Range Rover and ASICS who have already pulled money out) and RA isn't in the position where sponsors are lining up.
It also has an impact on team harmony particularly as he promised not to go down this path again.
No club in a major league would take the risk of hiring him so unfortunately we probably won't see him again on a sporting field. And as his sporting profile diminishes as too will his influence.
I'm not sure playing in Russia would be a good idea, regardless of whether he had other options.Sadly, I think it is headed for court and there will be no winners.
And highly likely that Israel will never play in AUS again. He may take the Russian deal, if that is for real. (Buts probably the only place he would get a start in any sport)
Going to cost him and RA lots of money no mater what the eventual outcome is.
Just think RA could have handled it better, taking the hard line to try and get IF to conform was always going to be high risk.
Just think RA could have handled it better, taking the hard line to try and get IF to conform was always going to be high risk.