I grew up on the north shore, played a lot of rugby union growing up. Never played league.As far as I can tell from your posts you watch absolutely no rugby league but then complain that rugby union is terrible in comparison.
If you'd watched the Charity Shield between St George and South Sydney you wouldn't be talking about how bad the rugby was in comparison.
Rugby League is a different game and has a much bigger fan base but it isn't because the game is far more exciting or fast or played to a much higher standard.
But these days I watch a lot more league then union, even more so then when I was a kid and I would watch similar amounts of each.
The simple fact is more often in rugby league players try and score a try.
More often in league players try to stop players from scoring a try. This contest is what makes sport worth watching.
Defensively more often in league people try and not only shut the play down but hit them hard when doing it.
I didn't watch the charity shield, but I watched the WCC in between the ads of the cricket and easts looked very sharp and smart.
The only thing union has going for it at the moment over league as a spectacle is the contest for possession but even that dies down when you allow a player ten years before releasing the ball once hes tackled, allowing the guy to shift his body, wait for his own teams fatties to show up and then placing it down, it may aswell be a play the ball in league it becomes that unlikely that the defence can force a turn over.
Also, the way some people consider union like some sort of special holy sport for special holy people who have rich bloodlines from kings actually turns people off the game. Believe it or not it is a game like league, afl, soccer, basketball or whatever and it will be judged on its entertainment value. However, if you are a tossbag and you carry on like a tossbag about union people may identify union as a sport for tossbags.