rsea
Darby Loudon (17)
I disagree but this isn't the place to discuss itI'm afraid you were all riled up without reason then - at no time did I campaign to get rid of Deans
I disagree but this isn't the place to discuss itI'm afraid you were all riled up without reason then - at no time did I campaign to get rid of Deans
Kiwi bookmakers favouring Cru. And the NZ TAB spokesman leaves little doubt as to his conclusions:
http://tvnz.co.nz/rugby-news/bookies-backing-cantabs-win-4285849
Not just Kiwi bookmakers, they'll be short favourites wherever you look, and rightfully so.
If you take out the draw against the canes due to the earthquake the Crusaders are only one game behind. Add to that them playing away from home every week they have been the best team in my opinion. I am a Reds fan but give credit where it is due and think the Crusaders deserve to be favourites and I hate to admit that I will pick them to win. (I hope I am wrong as I want a Reds win)Rightfully so? Queensland has been the best side all year and have home ground advantage.
Rightfully so? Queensland has been the best side all year and have home ground advantage.
Betting odds aren't just about form, it's also about reputation, how much people have betted on one side, what the objectives of the betting agency were in setting the odds etc etc.
IMO (and I'm not a betting man myself), but odds mean nothing....unless you're a sub-continent or Aussie cricketer
I'm not trying to take anything away from the Crusaders, I'm just amazed by how frequently the Reds have been written off.
Let's hope the Crusaders have been reading the NZ Herald.... perhaps Link should print this story out and stick it up in the Reds sheds to use as motivation actually.
Is this bloke serious??
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=10736159
absolutely right Tiger - at the end of the day the Reds on top - deserve to be favourites but only just - REDS by 1/2 point
Hmm. Betting odds in virtually all cases represent the bookmaker's best estimate of the true odds, otherwise they are subject to major coups by punters. Those odds can change as people bet, but that's because betting patterns are one of the proxies bookies use to make their book.
This might be contentions but I think the Crusaders were flattered by a fairly dismal Stormers effort on the weekend. They have a great lineup on paper but have often misfired this season. The Reds, by contrast, are more than the sum of their parts - a team. I don't see any reason why they can't win this.
I'm not trying to take anything away from the Crusaders, I'm just amazed by how frequently the Reds have been written off.
I'm not trying to take anything away from the Crusaders, I'm just amazed by how frequently the Reds have been written off.
MajorlyRagerly:....In front of Cooper you'll generally find words like mercurial, talented, in-form and outstanding. This on the back of the fact that I suspect many of my country folk, like me, can't stand the guy because we can't understand a Tokoroa native can be so proud to be a Wallaby....You have no idea how much the idea of seeing him hold the RWC aloft in his Greeen & Gold shits me to tears, no idea. The dislike and wilingness to see this bloke failed has for the most part, spilled over onto alot of people's general perception of the Reds. Wanting to see Cooper fail & thus wanting to see the Reds fail & hence writing about it.
Pretty good summation there MR.
Regardless of what happens on Saturday night, supporters of both the Reds and Crusaders have every right to feel bloody proud of what their team has done this year.
I am Red. That does not have conditions attached.
Game on.