I have to agree if he was removed for no reason, but to play the devils advocate, if he was removed by police it could have been for any number of alledged offences, what if and it is a huge waht if he had done something innapropriate in the toilets at half time? Maybe there was a reason?Just sent this off to Suncorp stadium via their website, I just don't think the removal was acceptable.
"To whom it may concern,
I recently attended a Reds game at Suncorp stadium on Saturday the 3rd of March 2012. Whilst I found Suncorp Stadium to be a great venue in terms of capacity, comfort and other services, I was very disappointed with the manner in which the security at the stadium treated the patrons. One enthusiastic supporter was sitting in section 314 and had been firing the crowd up the entire game to support the team, starting chants and the like. However in the 75th minute the patron was removed by police, seemingly at the order of one of the ushers whom had been talking to him. I had several issues with this, notably:
i) The patron had actually done nothing wrong as far as I'm aware. There was no disorderly behaviour, there was no harassment occuring, there was no real reason to evict him. From my observations it appeared as though he was removed simply because the usher had taken a dislike to his support. If the reason for his removal is because the 'Mexican wave' was being started by him then I would like to know, but I still strongly believe it was a fallacious decision to remove the customer.
ii) The behaviour was causing absolutely no problem for the crowd. Patrons are supposed to be removed because they are being 'Antisocial' and preventing others from enjoying themselves. I think I speak for everyone in the vicinity of the area in saying that this particular patrons actions where passionate, respectful and dignified; no one in the crowd had an issue with the person, and if they did they where in a very small minority. In fact, as he was removed, he recieved an ovation from nearly everyone nearby.
Hence, what was the actual reason for this patron being removed? Who was responsible for it? I was offended, indeed embarassed that the situation came to fruitition in which he was removed. There is a large community online, in sites such as Greenandgoldrugby.com that where also heavily offended by the decision. Could a member of stadium management please reasonably justify what happened.
Sincerely,
Harry Spicer"
Well I'm sure we are all aware how seriously some people take their job, but I was really frankly offended by security at suncorp last night.
The incident I'm referring to is the bloke in the Southern stand who was geeing everyone up and unleashing the support. He was starting some good mexican waves (as much as i don't like them due to the boredom connotations) but you could clearly see he was there to support the team, and he actually got the We are Red thing going. Like legit quite well.
Then security decided to throw him out.
I thought it was a massive dog act. Thoughts?
The bottom line is: stadium staff are lowly paid security who act first and think second. If they are doing something, like throwing someone out (rightly or wrongly), they've already made up their minds and are not going to relent, no matter how right or wrong they are.
Went to Brisbane on a corporate cricket gig thingie a few years back when they ejected the trumpet guy for inciting potential mass stampede with his rendition of When the Saints go marching in. You have GOt to watch these things.
The idea is clearly to have no fun at all. Every five minutes a security guard is crapping one someone about some inane bulshit.
The whole experience from the moment your bag got searched was unpleasant.
Spoke to some Pom supporters at the hotel that night after trumpet gate and they were justifiably pissed. Some were not going back the next day.
Agreed!! It looked great with the sea of sky blue.The flags looked great. All the sky blue around the stadium when they scored or when something good happened is a positive thing. Better than those flash for cash things they gave out for the last few years.
And then we had the footage of the male Reds supporter at ANZ last weekend not only "pissing at his seat" but sitting in the rising damp while he did so and then pulling his dacks up without a care in the world.
See, I told you it was a conspiracy.So not only did I get the game wrong and the stadium wrong and the code wrong but also the gender. The shame and embarrassment will linger for quite a while.
One thing the Reds probably should consider is the creation of an 'Adults Only' bay so that those who do get a bit loose with their language at times can do so without some 5 year old copping an ear full.
They already have non-licensed areas. If I was concerned about taking kids I would buy tickets in one of those bays. It's a footy game and you expect yelling and a bit of swearing. It would be a sad day indeed if they sanitised the crowds any more.One thing the Reds probably should consider is the creation of an 'Adults Only' bay so that those who do get a bit loose with their language at times can do so without some 5 year old copping an ear full.
One thing the Reds probably should consider is the creation of an 'Adults Only' bay