Bullshit. 20% clean ball from set piece is just hyperbole.
The forwards didn't cover themselves in glory but they won enough possession and territory to let the show ponies do their thing.
But they didn't, because they sucked as well.
So they deserve their share of criticism.
The backs were poor at times, so I agree. So too the forwards. Sure, we won enough possession to win the game, and yes, the attack was too easily shut down by the pretty good SA defence. The attack didn't do enough, and that's on both backs and forwards (in this day and age, they all have to know how to attack - witness the offload game of the All Blacks, for instance).
But the area of critical weakness that stood out for me last night was the woeful level of support for the ball runner / carrier. Good attacking forays snuffed by a turnover where the Wallabies showed ineffectual presence on their attacking ball. They don't seem to attack with a plan, a common purpose.
Cheika worked a plan at the Waratahs with pods of forwards working as a unit, with ball runners supported by players on their hip ready to add drive or cleanout. It doesn't happen at the Wallabies, but it does happen with the All Blacks. So is the plan flawed? For the Wallabies, yes. Either the players are just not there, or they can't do what is wanted, and thus for these players, it is flawed. For me it's a coaching and player issue. I don't think the model is flawed, but clearly they can't do it at the moment. So the coaching staff should adapt. They aren't.
This game pissed me off. They should have been able to win it reasonably comfortably, with all due respect to the Sprinbokke, who were just a bit less mediocre than us. That said, the Bokke deserved the win, which is a damning indictment on the Wallabies. Chance to make some history pissed away.